TEACHERS' PAY
6 — INTEEPKETING THE REGULATION A communication was received by tl Education Board yesterday from the D partment of Education, the eftect i which will not he welcomed by the (eac in« profession in the district. It was explained by tli& nssistant-se retavy (Mr. Hylton) that the coinmun cation was in the nature of an 'interpr tation or regulations governing the pa ment of.teachers' (salaries. The positu was that the Department had taken more parsimonious view of the regul Hons than had the Ixwrd, or, put another wav, tlie board had interpret! the regulations more liberally. iSow tl Department wished the board to obta a refund of certain moneys paid teachers. It might be that, strict speaking, the Department was correc It was a matter of interpretation. Mr. J. C. Harkness suggested thi the board might still be right. ' Mr. E. ?. Rishworth said that t ■bnani might obtain an \expert leg opinion with a view to safeguarding ti teachers against i:ho nigaOraly poln of tlie Department. He moved nccoi ingly, and the, hoard supported the pr posal. «
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19200318.2.25
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 148, 18 March 1920, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
178TEACHERS' PAY Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 148, 18 March 1920, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in