Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PROFITEERS

PROCEEDINGS AGAINST TWO CHEMISTS. London, November 8. The King's Bench refused a writ to prohibit the continuance of profiteering proceedings against two Wood Green chemists. The first charged ss. Cd: and the second 3s. Id. for preparing the same prescription. The Chief Justice rejected the ingenious argument that a oliemist was entitled to charge for skilled services. Undoubtedly, he said, skill was required in making any sort of sale. If the argument was admitted, the Profiteering Act would bo valueless.—Aus.N.Z. Cable Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19191112.2.71

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 41, 12 November 1919, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
84

THE PROFITEERS Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 41, 12 November 1919, Page 7

THE PROFITEERS Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 41, 12 November 1919, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert