IN BANCO
CASES ■ SET .DOWN FOll HEARING. The following cases, by way of originating suMMO!i>es, Jiavu been H't down lor hearing in Banco;— Prentice v. Smith- and Smith. Sole v. Ward and others. Snodgra.-iii v. Snudjjrass. Wilford and Jackson v. .T.ackson. Public Tnistce v. Aloyniliau. Cox v. Cox. Wellington City Council v. National Provident Fund. " Concroiler and Auditor-General v. Eltliam Drainage Board. Burgo and others v.., Williams aud other;!. Burton v. Burton. Bailey v. Hickson. Cases 011 Appeal. Atkinson v. Edwards. Savage v. Bell. Hagen v. Jury, Gregg and olnet's v. Commissioner oi Tux«s. Adams Dii and others v. Coniinisisoner of Taxed. Clark v. Clark, Hudclart-Pavlcer Co. v. il^Gowan. Beattie v. Jloore. Chambers v. Jlinisf.er of Stamps.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19190822.2.97
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 280, 22 August 1919, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
117IN BANCO Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 280, 22 August 1919, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in