SUPREME COURT
DIVORCE CASES The following divorce cneos are set down for hearing at the current sittings of tho Supreme Court:— 0 Before a Jury of Twelve. Howard Harold Armstrong v. Gertrude Armstrong, alleged desertion. Mary Ellon Sugdon v. Arthur Ross Sugden, alleged desertion. Linda Jauios v. Cecil Cavendish James, alleged misconduct (counter petition). Albert Berry v. Ine* Evelyn Berry and another, alleged misconduct. David AVilson v. Susan Wilson and another, alleged misconduct. Lillian Eliza Fox v. William James Fox, alleged habitual dnnkenncss. Ivy Pamela Cooper v. Frederick Stephen Cooper, alleged miswnduct. William Clarkson v. Genevieve Clarkson and anofchor, alleged misconduct. Before a Judge Alono. John William Matthews v. Mary Matthews, alleged desertion. Sidney Robert Cross v. Dorothy lolene Cross, alleged desertion. Ada Pluiuester v. Hugh Richard Plumester, alleged desertion. Mary Hannah Baker v. William Baker, alleged desertion. Athol Hiuntly MTCay v. Mabel Elizabeth MlCav, alleged misconduct. Mary Ellen Stanley v. Joseph Frederick Stanley, alleged misconduct. Brian Leslie Everton v. Eupliemia Hastwell Everton and another, alleged misconduct. Dorothy Maud Bushett v. Charles Henry Roxborough, nullity of marriage on ground of bigamy. Herbert Hancock v. Alice Marion Hancock, alleged .desertion, Mary Matilda Nees v. Gustav Charles Nees, alleged desertion. ' May Hutton v. Thomas Robertson Hutton, alleged habitual drunkenness. Amy Lydia May Barker v. Charle9 Thomas Luxon, nullity of mnrriage on ground of bigamy. Jessie Dind v: Melbourne Hall DiniJ, alleged desertion. 1 Ethel Mary Thomson v. William Alexander Thomson, alleged, misconduct. Ivy Orlowslti v. Francis Michael Orloweki, alleged misconduct.
1 Elizabeth Constanco Kezlcr v. Phillip George Kezler, alleged misconduct. Maud May Sterling v. Charles Edward Sterling, alleged desertion. Alice Mabel Ivitto v. Samael Arthur Harper ICitlo, alleged desertion. . Annie Benedict Hoed v. David Hood, alleged misconduct. Patience Amy Ruddle v. James Ruddle, alleged habitual drunkenness and cruelty. William Georgo Scott v. Emily Marion Scott omd another, alleged misconduct. FIXTURES ARRANGED. ' ' His Honour the Chief Justico« (Sir Robert Stout) on Saturday morning arranged tho following dates for hearing of civil and divorce, cases:— Wilson v. Wilson (divorce), August 12. Fox v. Fox (divorce) and Sugdon v. Sugden (divorce), August 13. Clarkson v. Clarkson and another (divorce), August 11. Spiro v. Schneideman (alleged breach of promise) and Armstrong v.-. Armstrong (divorce), August 15. Berry v. Berry (divorce), August 10. CVidman v. Public Trustee, August 18. Burch and Co. v. Corry and Co., August 19. Bank of New Zealand v. Russell, and Bernard v. Browning, August 211. Gregory v. H.M: the King, August 21. Sloan v. Cooper, August 22. Gibson and Patterson v. Farmers' Coop., Ltd., August 25. • Paramount Service v. N.Z. Picture Supplies, Ltd., August 2G. •Lee v. Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants, August 27. Staples v. Hanson, August 29.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19190811.2.67
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 270, 11 August 1919, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
447SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 270, 11 August 1919, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in