DIVORCE COURT

Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 199, 17 May 1919, Page 11

DIVORCE COURT

A BIG LIST. No fewer than 49 divorce eases are set down for hearing at tlio present sitting of tho Supreme Court. There is one ease for judicial separation. The list is believed to he tho largest set down for one sitting in New Zealand. Tho complete list is as linder:— Before a Common Jury nf Twelve. Hildegard Eady v. Albert Eady. Howard llarold Armstrong v. Gertrude Armstrong. Robert Clement Henry Connor v. Clara Josephine Connor and another. .Albert Edward Ernest Orlando Wellington Brooks v. Cecilia Mary Myrtle Brooks anil another. Linda James v. Cecil Cavendish James. Bertha Alice M'Coll v. Peter-Henry M'Coii. r Florence Ann Elizabeth Hendricksen v. Daniel Potor Heudrickeen. Charles L. J. E. F; Smith v. Jano Smith and another. . Before a Judrre Alone. Mary CI. E. M'Alister v. Thomas D. M'Alister. Alexander Calder Crossan v. Agnes Crossan. Annie O'Brien v. James O'Jirien. William Duffy., v. Mary Ellen Dulf}y_ Arthur Herbert Coiyard v. Doi> 'Winifred Coward and another. Herbert Verne Thompson v. Anna Jnno Thompson. Ester Curtis v. Sydney Harold Curtis. Elizabeth Stewart. Peiirs'oii v. John Pearson. John Murphy v. Adelaide Emily Murphy. Janet Stather v. Albert Edward Slather. '

Charles Butte) - Nixon v. Maria Jane Nixon aud another. Rennio Alberta Townpml v.. Frank Frederick Towneiul. Ellen Isabel Morris v. James Morris." Anna Choline Oldham v. Arthur Oldham. • i , Isabella. Iderlcna Tronson v. Arthur Edward De Cudray Troiison. Helen Jiuld v. Arthur Stanley Judd. Alice Emma Hose Cotter v. Frederick Charles Henry Cotter. Charles. Southwell Mahoney v. Minnie Barbara ilahonev and another. Matlicw Hogsden v. Ada Mary Charlotte Hojjsden and another. Catherine* Barry v. Robert Deey William Barry. John Hill v. Florrio Hill anil another. Elizabeth Wigg v. Ueuben Wigs!.' George Agustus Coates v. Ada Alice Coates and another. ... Muriel Collins Rqss v. James Murdoch I? oss. Fanny 'Biorden v. Timothy James Eiordeu.

May Agnes Harland v. "William Thomas Harland. Edith Henrietta Croucher y. Martin Croucher. Mary. Ellen Sugden v. Arthur Boss Sugdeii. . ; .Albert Berry v. Inez Evelyn Berry and anotner. . . ' . , Thomas. Edlin v. Margaret Hannah Edlin and another. Janet Annie. Jackson v. Walter JackB Jeannie Davina Duncan v.' Arcliibt\ltl Campbell piincan. Eliza Ann Bird v. Arthur Thwnas Bird. Nellie May"ttailgeV \v Charles Philip Badger. . Ernest Honry Cundy v. - Marguerite Cundy and another. . James Baldwin v. Linny BaUhviP and another. . Ellen Alberta 4n»ie Dny v. William David Day. ' ' Emily Catherine Smith r. John Smith. Edward John Woolley v. Jane Caroline AVoolloy. • Euth Isabella Young v. Erie Balfa\ir Young. JUDICIAL SEPARATION. Mary Ani»a v. Eplis Black.

THORNYCROFr MOTOR VBHIGI,E REPLACE HOUSE TEAMS.--Draught horses aro seen less and less' pji our roads and streets each year, as motor transport develops. For heavy carrying, for dumping,' for delivery service; iu fact, 'for all transport botli in town and country for which horses have been used iii tlio past, Thornycroft Commercial Yehicles will 1>? used in the future. Made'ill 5 sizes, from 30 to 10 h.pl, with carrying capacities of 2, 2j, 3, 4|' and C toiis, there' is a model for every purpose. Write to-day to A. Ha trick aiid Co., Wanganui and WellingtonAdyt.