Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LOWER HUTT COURT

The monthly sitting, of the Lower Hutt Magistrate's Court vas held yostcrday before Mr. W. G. Riddell, S.M., and Mr. J. WiTkins, J.P. Benjamin Jfudgiyay, junior, for breach of a prohibition order, was fined 20s. and costs.

For failinpr to clear his section of noxious weeds; John M'Callum was fined JK and costs.

E. Bryant applied for the cancellation of a'(maintenance, rvder of ,ss. per week in respect to \\U adopted son, who is at present at the Wenu-oa Training Farm. An order was made for the cancellation of tlii» order and remittance of arrears amounting to .£29 !ss.

For ridin<? bicycles nfter sunset without a light. .T. Hnrrell. J. Owen, T). Seymour, A. Smith. W. Rtraffon. J. Walker. fi. ■Watson, Tv. TTngland. J?. O. Broderick, G. Barlow, K. Orr, ,T. Salter, and V. Smith were onch convicted and ordered to pay 7s. costs. v Fov usin,? indecent language, Albert Smith was fint'd ?lk and 7s.' costs, in default '13 hours' imprisonment.

For pprmitHtig f-toolc to wander, .T. ■Rradley. F. Y.hW. A. Fva««. F. Ferritti, H. Walker,. A. Peck, P. Kennedy, Co«tienn aid Co.. mid J. ft. Croft were each fipnd Ms. i'ml 7s. costs., ■ C. rimniiicbaiTi. niainst whom there were- throe diaries of permitti-i stock to wander, was fined Ms. and 7s. costs on ench charge. CIVIL CASES. , .Tudtrmnnt by default wns given i» the following undefended msc=—CTiiH W'-t Board v. D. Everest mid Sons. lS«s. P''.. costs 25.; same v. T). F.vPrest, £2 19s. -Idcosts Rs.: IT. JFnrtin v. .Tame? A"W. =£1 ■ts., coii-= 55.; ,T. Thorne v. S. F. Pars'"w. S"M IRs. 10d., costs S' o . G'.; tower Hutt Borough Council v. Tl. Peek and Co.. JJII ss. (id., costs ,V.: same v. 1). U. PHc, >fil Us. 2d.. rnsts ss. Gpo''i»i? S. Jlnrtin clnimed frnro Orr Bros, (lie-sum of ,P(i 2-s. fid. for inu'iuka scrub and ?00fl stakes snnpHotl. For Ihc de.feiicß it was contonded rl'«r. only 3GOO stakes ivere sunpHod. After lica'rine the ovideme tl'e Jfaaistrate pave judgment for ,Ct Rs. 3d. and costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19190307.2.70

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 139, 7 March 1919, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
342

LOWER HUTT COURT Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 139, 7 March 1919, Page 6

LOWER HUTT COURT Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 139, 7 March 1919, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert