Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FLOGGING IN PAPUA

DISCUSSION IN AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS. Melbourne, March 4. Considerable capital is being made out of a statement by u Federal, member of Parliament that German Now Guinea natives were flogged with the consent of the Administration. The Minister of Defence replies that floggings up to twenty lashes aro permitted under the strictest official surveillance for the grossest offence. Under the German Administration private persons were allowed to floqr natives for the most trivial' offences. The natives were so long used to this form of punishment that the British authorities decided that it was necessary to retain corporal punishment in a modified form as a deter-, rent to crime.—Press Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19190305.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 137, 5 March 1919, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
111

FLOGGING IN PAPUA Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 137, 5 March 1919, Page 5

FLOGGING IN PAPUA Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 137, 5 March 1919, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert