Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOFT GOODS TRADE

THE COURT'S AWARD. • By Telegraph—Preus Association. Auckland, February 17. The 'Arbitration Court gave decision in the eoft goods employees dispute today. The only questions of importance were those of koure and preference. The Court said that the'hours were governed by the Shops and Offices Act, and that it did not see its way to interfere_ with these hours in respect to one particular class of shop. No preference was granted regarding female employees. The Court decided that any female in a dress, Manchester, drapery, furnishing, men's and juvenile clothing, mercery, piece silks, velveteens, carpets, linoleums, bedding, cotton, dress goods, or prints departments shall be paid one-hulf more than the wages specified for females in the scale.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19190218.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 123, 18 February 1919, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
119

SOFT GOODS TRADE Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 123, 18 February 1919, Page 4

SOFT GOODS TRADE Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 123, 18 February 1919, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert