SUPREME COURT
LIST OF CIVIL CASES. The following is the list of civil cases set down for hearing at the current sessions:— Before a Jury of Twelve. A. H. Grierson v. H. T. J. Thacker, claim £5000 damages for libel. I. D. Knox v. the Paramount Picture Proprietary, Ltd., claim £750 damages for accident. . J. Bradshaw v. J. E. Fitzgerald, claim ,£750 breach of agreement. Before a Jury of Four. J. H. Ratcliffe v. Davidson- and Co., claim d£22B for goods sold. M. Kearney v. Munt, Cottrell, and to., claim £-461 damages for accident. Before a Judge Alone. H. Heimann v. Griffiths and Co., Ltd., application, taking of accounts. Turnbull and Jones; Ltd., v. Jensen and others, declarations, etc. IC. Barber and others v. E. Keene .and J. Eeed, claim .£225 amount under mortgage. Wellington Meat Export Company v.' City Corporation, claim .£2075 rccovery-,of refund of fees. W. MT-ennan v. W. J. Jorgenson, claim .£BIO balance duo under agreement. 13. M. Bevan v. T. Bevan and B. Bevan, claim ,£SOO breach of covenant. M. E. Louis Smith v. L. W. Balkind, declaration and accounts. J. Staples and Co., Ltd., ,v. H. Hanson, claim £250 money lent. H. Barry v. the A.M.P. Society and others, claim £56 15a. amount due on policy. . A. R. Cadman and another v. the Public Trustee, repayment and accounts. H. Hawson and others v. S. A. George and others, declarations, etc. W. Phillips v. F. Hulse, claim £432 damages for breach of contract. L. W. M'Kenzie v. J. W. Oudby and others, alteration of agreement or declaration. E. Hadley v. A. Sent and A. T. Munn, claim for return of stock or ,£l6O. P. A. Hadley v. G. W. Minter and another, claim £281 lis. 6d. in respect of promissory note. H. S. Irvine and another v. 11. Spear] 1 claim £304 12s. 6d. for work done. If. Liddle v. 11. Rolleston, declaration, etc. L. P. Preston v. R. H. Dillon, claim : for specific performance and £100 damages, etc. E. E. Campion v. A. G. Jacobsen, claim £250 damages for lion-performance! Counter-claim, return of £25 deposit. L. C. Williams v. H. C. Williams; claim for judgment for possession of .premises. Divorce Cases. Before a Jury of Twelve. Arthur South v. Mary Helena South (desertion). Amelia .Wilson v. Thomas Henry Wilson (desertion). Polly Gee Drake v. Henry Drake (desertion). Philip Desire England v. Daphne Hetty England and another (adultery). Before a Judge Alone, i George Watson y. Annie Watson (lun- ; acy). Olaf Johnson v. Lilian Johnson and another (adulter^). Margaret M.ickle v. Ernest G. Mickle (desertion). Annie O'Brien y. James O'Brien (adultery). Catherine Maud Gehrig v. George Joseph Gehrig (adultery); .Tames E. F. Perry v. Mary Evelyn ■Perry (lunacy). Nellie Hodgson v. Sydney Harold Hodgson (adultery). Eliza Domb v. Lewis Domb (adultery). Fanny Beatrice Hedley v. lhomas T. Hedley (desertion). Herbert Verne Thompson v. : Annetta > Jane Thompson (desertion). i Kathleen Ward v. William Joseph • Ward (adultery). Charles William .Munro v. Rebecca , Munro (adultery). i Blanche East v. Stanley East (adul- , tery). , Cornelia Hume v. James Alexander . Hume (desertion). , Walter Percival Carter v. Jessie Car- : tor and another (adultery). Ellen Ann Htll v. George Alexander i Hill (desertion). : George Roland Williams v. Hannah l Louisa Williams (desertion).
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19190208.2.68
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 115, 8 February 1919, Page 9
Word count
Tapeke kupu
539SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 115, 8 February 1919, Page 9
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.