Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE LIQUOR LAWS

ALLEGED BREACHES LICENSEE AND BARMAN CHARGED The licensee of the Gresham Hotel, Patrick Joseph Griffin, and a barman named Albert Brown, were proceeded against before Sir. W. G. Riddell, S.M., at the Magistrate's Court yesterday afternoon, on information of having supplied liquor after the hour of closing, on July 24, to persons who had no right to be on the premises. Inspector Marsack prosecuted, and Mr. J. J. M'Grath appeared for the defendants. Corporal A. Magnire, of the New Zealand Military Police, stated that on July 24, in company with Sergeant Mntheson, of the civil police, he visited the Gresham Hotel about 9 p.m. Hβ saw the defendant Brown carrying a tray witn some iiquor glasses. On a slide in front of a bar upstairs were four empty glasses in front of four men. When witness and the police sergeant entered the room the four men "bolted upstairs. Two soldiers were found at the top of the landing. The sergeant asked Brown if ho had served certain of the men, and defendant replied in the affirmative. He said he had supplied them under the impression that they were boarders. Corroborative evidenco was given by Sergeant Matheson, and Constable Dudding- . , It was stated thnt when approached on the macter the .licensee said he took care to see that only boarders were served with liquor after hours, and that had ho known that the mea in question were in the house he would not have allowed them to be served. Mr. M'Gratli submitted that the two informations should be dismissed on the ground that the evidence was too slight to prove that the licensee was aware that an offence was bding committed. Inspector Marsack contended thnt although the hotel was well conducted, and the. licensee would not knowingly be a party to a breach of the still he was responsible for the act of his servant. In the course of evidence, Brown said that when the police came in he was carrying some liquor into the rjommercial room to some boarders. He would not eerve anybody who was not a boarder for Kliat would entail his dismissal, and/he was positive that he did not hand liquor to anybody who was not staying at the hotel. On the night in question there were a number of publicans from all over the Dominion staying at the hotel, and it was to some of them that ho was taking the drinks. ' . The licensee stated that he had instructed the barman not to serve anyone but boarders after hours. _ _ His'Worehip reserved his decision until to-day.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19180817.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 282, 17 August 1918, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
432

THE LIQUOR LAWS Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 282, 17 August 1918, Page 3

THE LIQUOR LAWS Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 282, 17 August 1918, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert