LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
THE KELBURN CASE
gir,—In your issue of oven date, ilr. M'Carthy.'S.fli., wlieu summing up against ray daughter, is reported to have eaid that "the Court could not accept tlio statement that her father, from a total income of ,£3 3s. a week, had sent her five or six pounds a month. This statement is contrary to fact, and I am not a little surprised to find my wages of j£3 Cs. a week, not £3 3s. a week (another error), ne representing my total iucome. Besides my wages, -I desire to state- that I hove other sources of income of which. I am sure, I can, easily give proof positive even to an incredulous Magistrate. Thanking you in anticipation,—l am, etc., P. M'CAETHY.Hastings, June 5.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19180607.2.40
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 222, 7 June 1918, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
129LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 222, 7 June 1918, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in