Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL

lARSH AND ANOTHER V. IMLEGEIt. (Roc. May 5, 5.5 p.m.) ;■ London, May 4. J lln the New Zealand appeal case, .Marsh j iiid another versus Imleger, judgment ] Fas reserved.—Aus.-N.Z. Cnbio Assn. , '• [The above case concerned the lease 1 if a small grazing run under the Land ; let of 1892; whether the right of re- ; iewal was governed by the Lund Act of < !X)8 and its amendments; whether the ] ental was subject to a Statutory Court, i ixed by the lessee, or the Land Board; ] rhat statutory provisions applied in re- . pect to arbitration.]

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19180506.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 194, 6 May 1918, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
96

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 194, 6 May 1918, Page 6

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 194, 6 May 1918, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert