BREACH OF ANTI-SHOUTING LAW
By Telegraph—Prosit Association. Tiiwiru, November 8. The Stipendiary Magistrate was.occupied most, of the (lav h»arimr charges resnectlng four town hotels under the AntiSlioutin? Law. Three oases were dismissed on the grounds that two special constables' evidence was cfllfliicd and unsatisfactory. I'l Hie fourth ease th» barmaid admitted serving n "shout." and two customers admitted tt"> nnrchnee. Th'> bnver said he Vnd a so f <- drink himself, and contended that if his friend h'ad had this, and himself the hard one. ttiere would have bpan no offpice. aid Hie Magistrate said that was so. Defpndnnt said he fhoi ll ?ht it would bf no breach of the law the other way. The customers were fined 33 each, and the barmaid -£1 and the loss of her., licence for six months.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19171109.2.35
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 39, 9 November 1917, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
133BREACH OF ANTI-SHOUTING LAW Dominion, Volume 11, Issue 39, 9 November 1917, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in