Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES

VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF

His Honour Mr. Justice Hosking and a jury ot four yesterday htnrd a claim for £121) damages brought by H. F- Moss, Ltd., against Frederick William Adams, o£ Blenheim, ironmonger. Sir. It. P. O'Leary appeared Cor the plaintill company, unci Mr. T. Noavo for the defendant.

. Mr. O'lioary said that, tlie claim was for damages for breach of agreement. The plaintiff company were tlio sole agents for tho Success Hand Vacuum Cleaner, made l>y an American (Inn called the HutchiEon Manufacturing Company. Adams entered into an agreement with the company to become their agent in the Marlborough district. The agreement provided that defendant should, over the period 1912-15. buy 100 machines from the company, but during the time epecified defendant failed to purchase more than twenty. When, about December. 1915. Moss. Ltd.. intimated that they expected him to lake the balance, defendant refused to do so. The claim of £120 was at tho ate of £1 10s. per machine, profit that tbe Moss Couinany were making on tho sales.

The defence was that the plaintiff acted only as agent for the Hutchison Manufacturing Co., and that any agreement was subject to confirmation. Before any confirmation ha'l been obtained, defendant withdrew from the arrangement. It, was further contended that plaintiff, as agent for the Hutchison Company, had no right to sue the defendant, and that false representations had been made to induce defendant, to enter into the contract.

The jury, after a short retirement, returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount claimed.

Judgment wan entered accordingly, and the Court adjourned till to-day.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170829.2.62

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3176, 29 August 1917, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
272

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3176, 29 August 1917, Page 9

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3176, 29 August 1917, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert