TOWN V. COUNTRY
Sir,—Mr. Strand made ail -unjust point against the city vendors when he insinuated that the latter were more criminal than the countrysidcrs m the mattor of milk prosecutions. The:reply to that would be a demand for the actual proportion of convictions to samples taken, when Mr. Strand would find his argument in queer street, •j:' l ® J vo:1 , feature of the case is that Mr. Straw knows as well as any one that 'the arbitrary and crude working of these cases makes for an unfair and uncertain incidence of misfortune on- both sides, ana never actually proves misfeasance on cither. As his remark will, of course, find its way into all tlie papers. tho rcply ought to get the August 15.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170816.2.53.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3164, 16 August 1917, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
124TOWN V. COUNTRY Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3164, 16 August 1917, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in