Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MEN'S STATEMENT

"The position is that the representatives of tho sheopowners of Now Zealand have absolutely refused to make any attempt lo reach an agreement," said j\lr. .1. GrayndJer, secretary of tho New Zealand Shearers' Association (incorporated in Iho A.P.U.) to a Dominion representative after tho closo of tho meeting with l.ho employers yesterday, '"rim only conclusion, wo can como to is thai, they arc not out for peace. They do uol wish lo extend fair ploy to tho' worker* who aro engaged, in this very profitable industry. "Tho resolution handed lo the representatives of tho shearers by the sheepowners today state) in effect that the delegates of the Shearers' Association, aro not qualified to speak for tho organised workers in their industry. That contention is absurd on the fuce of il. Tho Shearers' Association was formed lir (ho different Shearers' and Shed Hand*' Unions throughout Now Zealand. The executive of the association is elect: o<l by (lie members of the unions, so that'(he constitution is as democratic as it could l>e made. Tho executive n.ppoinled delegates to meet tho eraployors at this conference. But tho sheepowners refused to accept the credentials of tho delegates. They pplifc straws by saying that they -would lx> prepared to meet individuals elected by tho separate unions. "The Shcep-ownors' Federation had agreod to meet tho delegates of the. association. Tho conference had boen arranged in preliminary conforonco, and tho delegates had travelled to Wellington in order to confer with tho employers. But after tho snoop-owners reached ■Wellington and got into touch iritli tho 'professionals' here, tlicy decided not to meet us. The reason alleged for their decision is groundless, since the credentials of our delegates were indisputable. Tho shecnowners had already rnessnised the association in their correspondence. "No doubt the shecpowners will expect lo receive what nssistanco tho present Tory Government can give them in sin attempt to batter the shearers inlo submission. The attitude of the.-association will be a matter for consideration in the light of tho new development." %

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170531.2.97

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3098, 31 May 1917, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
337

THE MEN'S STATEMENT Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3098, 31 May 1917, Page 8

THE MEN'S STATEMENT Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3098, 31 May 1917, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert