A CHAFF LAW SUIT
Syuney, May .12. In the case Meredith v. Foley, judgment was in favour of the defendants. The Judge remarked that the obaff. was good, sound, and bright, as certified by the New Zealand Government »ittdcr, but it was not equal to the best Quality chaff. Stay of execution was griwieil until June 30. —Press Assn. [Meredith and Co., of New Zealand, secured a verdict of £241, the hill amount claimed, from Foley Bros., for an alleged breacli of contract in connection with a sale of chaff. Defendants appealed, and a new trial Fas ordered.]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170514.2.47
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3083, 14 May 1917, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
98A CHAFF LAW SUIT Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3083, 14 May 1917, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in