Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GOVERNMENT INCOME RETURNS

Sir, —Will you allow me a little space in your columns in order to- point outi what appears to bo a somewhat unwise and arbitrary instruction given in the> above under Part D, Values of Livestock on Land at close of year. v wp v aro told that we are to "adopt a standard value per head, for each class o£ live stock," i.e., sleep, cattle, or horses,, etc., and adhere to Uat value per head in subsequent returns. Now, sir, I should be glad to know what consti-tutes-a standard value per head for sheep ranging from lambs' to ewes or, rams,, or for cattlej from calves to bullocks, unless it be the market value.- ■ We must bear in mind that an. "average" is not a "standard." The farmer is apparently allowed toi quote any "standard" he may choose,and which will differ possibly from thafe of his neighbour to the extent of (0 or 80 per cent. I "know of greater, variations than these now being made,- . the difference certainly not ; being in* the quality of the animals, but rather in the relative owner's ideas on the subject of taxation. The fallacy and in--justice of the system is. however, most*, clearly shown by a few entries from al stock-book. A, a dairy farmer, starts the year, with, say, 20 cows, which he puts down at £7 per head. Having some sparef land, he buys a month afterwards 20 3-year-old steers, for -which he pays £i 3 10s. per head. He gets from his cows 17 calves, which he sells'at JOsj per head—£34. Two of his cows- die, the balance, IS, with his 20 steers au the close of the year, he is to value at—hy the Government method—£7i ner head. His stock-book thus reads : £ To 20 cows at £7 :.. '. W To steers at £13 10s. 270 410 ' Bv 17 calves sold 341 By 38 head (cow's and steers, at £7) 208 Balance loss ..:.V. 113 410 To take an alternative mefhod. based! on some approach to market values. I might quote the following for the same stock i and business:— . ' £ To 20 cows at £7 .'. »140 To 20 steers at £13 10s. 270 Balance, profit, 50 460 By 17 calves sold, at 40s 34! By 18 cows, at £7 ::... 126 By 20_bullocks, at £15 !. ... 300 ' 460 Here, the bullocks being nearly a year older are practically ready fori the butcher, and really worth £18, but a low' estimate is given. Even if) put down at cost, the difference in suits from the two methods would ba £130. The cows being more of a fixed quantity, are put down at a fixed rate. Possibly my figures are • somewhat crudely stated, but the possibilities of unfairness and abuse under the Gov* eminent plan are surely evident, and a! better method is strongly called for.—* I am, etc., FARMER. Manawatu, May 4. '

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170508.2.63

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3073, 8 May 1917, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
482

GOVERNMENT INCOME RETURNS Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3073, 8 May 1917, Page 6

GOVERNMENT INCOME RETURNS Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3073, 8 May 1917, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert