Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CHANNEL RAIDS

HOW ARE THEY POSSIBLE? PERTINENT QUESTIONS IN | PARLIAMENT London, May 1. In the House of Commons, Sir Henry Dalzicl asked why enemy attacks were possible oil the coast of Kent, while the naval attacks on Zecbruggo were apparently impossible. Sir K. Carson (First Lord of the Admiralty) said it must he remembered although the loss of life caused by these raids was regrettable, the raids do not possess any military value. He assured the House that' continuous attention was given to this area. Mr. R. P. Houston: Can you explain how the enemy destroyers pass through our minefields with impunity? Sir E. Carson: I cannot explain.— Router.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170503.2.43

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3069, 3 May 1917, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
110

THE CHANNEL RAIDS Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3069, 3 May 1917, Page 5

THE CHANNEL RAIDS Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3069, 3 May 1917, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert