Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"SUNDAY GOLF"

ON THE MUNICIPAL LINKS ; APPEAL BY CITY COUNCIL [.'..: DECISION. RESERVED i". '';/;; " ; '~.___ . "V . 1 An appeal against, the finding of Mr. S. E.- M'Carthy, S.M., in a case '■■ of Sunday golfing on a municipal re-. • ' serve, was. heard in the Supreme Court yesterday. _ The Chief Justice presid- ' ed, and him with Their Honours Sir ! John, Denniston. and Mr. Justice '; Cjiapinan. were associated. • - - Tiie. City Council, as-appellant in the : case, was represented by Mr. A. Gray, - -K.C.. - and Mr. John O'Shet. Sir ! John Findlay, K.C., and, Mr. J. J. ! M'Grath represented the. respondent, '■ AVm. Whitehead. It was admitted in the Lower Court "• that the defendant played golf on a 1 Sunday upon one of the reserves, but! > the Magistrate dismissed the ease I 3 ! upon three grounds:. that. the by-law • fwaa repugnant to tho laws of New " Zealand, that it unreasonably dealt " with the question of religion, and that P it was ultra vires as unnecessarily in- '. terfering with tho right of private 6 judgment. < , •■ Mr., Gray submitted tliat the Mag--1 istrate had. dealt with the by-law as.. ' though it were made solely in the interests of. Sunday observance. He 1 proposed to show that tho by-law was ' not so made, but that it. was reason- ' ablo to assume that other consideraJ tions-might have/influenced the coun- | cil... The; links upon which' the .dofendI ant played .were part of a puhlio re- /. serve vested, in .the corporation by a b conveyance .of,.March;, 20, 1873.,; ! The.' 3 conveyance was made upon trust that 1 the-lands should-bo-for ever-used and " appropriated.., as public ■,'-.- grounds for the inhabitants, and should be controlled.by such rules.and rogula--1 tions. as tho corporation, should, direct. I. There were only two by-laws prohibit- ) ing the playing of games on the munil cipal;.reserves -Sundays. They j' read,:.;"No.persoii:.shall:play. or prac-.i )• tise !golf on Sunday, on, any part t' of the' Town Belt reserves that are vest- - cd in the corporation"'; and "lib; person } shall play, or take, part; in football;- , cricket, or any other similar game in . any such park, .reserve/ or ground on , any Sunday." ■'■'■■>..- , Tiie council had not .let any part of f the reserves to any golf club, but had ~ established the links for the benefit of l : . all tho inhabitants. ; To protect per- . sons desiring to take such recreation as ; walking on the links, the by-law had [ been passed limiting the rights of a i comparatively small number of. the int habitants, of the city. 5 Mr. Justice Chapman: "Protect?" , "What" protection is needed? Is; golf , .a dangerous game? ' .Counsel: s We submit that it is. If j Your. Honour had ever been struck by . a golf ball . •'.-..- j! Tho danger' of golf-playing on Sun-. . day, proceeded counsel, was that\ on r Sunday more people were on the links. J The Court might assume that that con- , sideration might reasonably have been . present in-the minds of the council. [.The -corporation .had- fapilities ; - to. golfers to play-for -six days of the ; week- at a small cost, and at the same :.-time had the rights of those who, fancying golf a dangerous,game, : desired to go upon the grounds. [ :-Sir..: John Denniston.'■ .commented I that.,the general right of:the public to , play golf on the reserves was thus, lim- |.: :ited:.to±the.- sis: daya :on which .people- , were unable to play, j., people:.did' j not work for the full sis-days of 'the , week, and, further, that only a part' , of tho general public desired to play. I golf. jHo-went: on to,, : quote,'the sec'-. : tmn. giving the council.-'poVc'r to pro-' ! hibitialtogether'the; plaj'ihg'' of any : I particular'.game on the reserves.. That I surely implied the lesser power, of pro- . bibitirig ■the playing of a particular L game.'not;altogether,; but for.a shortL period. ''•■'■' Sir John Denniston: Why' is tho \ word "altogether" "used, if not to limit , it to "altogether"? ! Counsel went on to quote authority for the statement that a Court of Justice could-not investigate'-the motives of a legislative body w'hilo acting intra , Tires, - Tiie council had the-power to i regulate as it thought fit tho'playing of games on .the reserves, and it was . not competent for the Court to inquire . why the council chose''.-to make the regulation in question. • ;' Mr. O'Shea supplcmentei Mr. Gray's t argument. He observed that the ease ; had given rise toan'outbrnst of Sabl' batarianism, bub the council wished to . be' dissociated from such support, if support- it could be called."' It, might bo known that certain representations were made to the council, - but ceuld it be said that the council acted upon them, when there were other reasons attributable?', .... - - .-. ..--.-• . Sir John -Eindlay,'- in - reply, suhinitted that if tho Court was-..satisfied' I that the -purpose for which the by-law [. was passed was solely to enforce, a I measure of :Sabb'ath' observance,' the ■ Magistra'te's'ifm'ding must be upheld. ; The Magistrate had found, and stated L unequivocally, that the solo reason for ; the passing of the by-law was one of , Sabbath'observance. r „v,-.The!passing of [ the by-law was due t'orthejinfluence of . a deputation of | ed upon the council upon, itthe "evil of this. Sabbath:dbsecratioiri? ,: ; The Magistrate'.]iad , y:addressed;;;.:liis; mind to_ the questions-! of■."danger^ri'i--s sance,' inconvenience,'-' and complaint,' ■ and had found against; the council .on ' each. '■-. ■•. 'v. •■ , Sir John Denniston: You must ■ then suggest that the defence of the i by-law raised for the appellants is a ' dishonest'one. ; Sir John Findlay: I can't help that, • lour Honour. I do say that when the council passed this by-law its sole purpose in the council's mind was Sabbath observance,, and there was'-.;no other ■ reason for passing it at that time. . Mv . friend is quite right in trying to find ■ some other reasons, for it, because ho ' sees the difficulty. - For if'the by-law i was passed.-for Sabbath observance • only, there is an end of the case. I The links were established, continued counsel, for the people who. could play ( only on Sunday; they were being play- , cd on for some months-'before'the; by r ..' . law was made; no.complaihtjwas'made' about any danger or accidoht.br'about [ any misconduct-on'flie'-'part, of !.the . players; and the. only.fact, to'.be looked , to to explain the'ipassing.oF'the hy- \ law was tho deputation of [. "If the members of'.the City Council . were hero to-day,"; s'aid'counsel;.-'On; what appeared "in;the' 'newspapers !W-, garding the oas'e,-'.they;:Would.,havc»: to admit that thisi.pjy-lowVWasiso'passed;' Counsel for tho a.pp>llttnts;'h'a\ { e:.takon.;' . a certain viow ' fdf'':'th6;; . arguing this case, but'''it';'d6ego.hbt'' i follow that the City Council shares I .that view. I want to protect myself •!■'-frbm any suggestion that I am here | to allege that tho members of the City ■ Council are advancing a ground now • that was not.advanced before." Apart , from the question of Sabbath observ- , ance, the prohibition of playing golf 1 on Sunday .would benefit nobody, but • would placo a considerable number of • people in a position in which they , would bo unable to play golf at.all. , What was tho loss of.the golfers to bo balanced against? -The case was clearly onq, cdims'el finally Submitted, -in which the Magisti'ate's'dccision should be upheld. Mr. Gray submitted again in iho' course of his reply that the council

was not hound to give any reason for making the by-law. ' Mr. Justice Chapman: You might improve your position if jou.did give good reasons. Snob, for instance, as that golf was found to be dangerous in certain-localities. . . . Sir John Denniston You ' are not going to give any reasons, but you arc going to take the risk of not giving 'them. ' - The Court reserved; its decision.' -.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170331.2.81

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3042, 31 March 1917, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,227

"SUNDAY GOLF" Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3042, 31 March 1917, Page 12

"SUNDAY GOLF" Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3042, 31 March 1917, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert