Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHARGE AGAINST A SOLDIER

' SHOULD THE HOSPITAL BOARD APOLOGISE? ' . '. v .' . The man who jumped the fence which Surrounds ono of . tho infectious ' quaiters of the ''Wellington/ Public Hospital , (or rather the man . who was accused" of having performed this feat in atnletios) was again discussed b,v the Hospital Board yesterday. It seemed 'from the.discussiou that, someone jiimp«d the fence, and that a returned soldier. was accused of having committed the breach, of the institution's regulations. He ; denied the charge; and offered to prove that he was; elsewhere on the occasion in question; • . When' the board met yesterday, Mr.' J. W. MacEwan said that as the boardhad hot been, able to bear'out the a(>j cusation against- -tho soldier it should apologise. The, Public Health - Committeo of ■ the board had been asked 'to go. into, thei-matterj and had admitted that the man did not commit, the ■ offence. Therefore there was only. one thing for the board to do—withdraw.: Mr. 6. Nash:, What is he'supposedto have done? Jumped a fence f Terribly serious crime I -. - , Mr. MacEwan: It is serious,, seeing that /the fenco surrounds the infectious diseases I. move that this board shall send a reply withdrawing the allegation and expressing- regret.' . The chairman (Mr. H.. Baldwin): I don't think I could put that motion/; -I could pufc a motion to the-effect that the matter should be sent back, to the committee to. report.. Then it could be said, perhaps, ■_ that' the committee' found that a mistake had been mado. Several members said that the-mat-ter had already been referred to the committee, and that no report had been .mado to the board. One member declared that the-committee had flouted the board. Mr ! . J.. Smith said -that it seemed to him that Mr. MacEwan was right, and that as aman had been maligned, th« board should' apologise. "We havo no evidence- that he . jumped the fence, and if we are -honest men we will-say so. and withdraw." The raot.ion to refer the matter back io the committee was carried.' The Rev. H. Van Staveren (chairman of the committee): You will get no more report., TVo said the man did not jump the/fence, and that is all you will get. The chairman of the board: Are you the whole committee? Perhaps someone else will hold an opinion on matter. : The Rev. Van Staveren: You will not get any more.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170323.2.74

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3035, 23 March 1917, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
395

CHARGE AGAINST A SOLDIER Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3035, 23 March 1917, Page 7

CHARGE AGAINST A SOLDIER Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3035, 23 March 1917, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert