Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW' REPORTS

SUPREME COURT

CRIMINAL SESSIONS OBSCENE LANGUAGE CHARGE FAILS Ulie Supreme Court criminal sessions were continued yesterday, before Mr. Justice Chapman. Mr. V. R. Meredith. prosecuted. The case was continued in wihich Joseph Kenny was charged with having used obscene language at No. 247 Tinakori Road, on July 16. Mr. E. G. Jellicoe appeared for the accused, and contended that the uncorroborated evidence of what a constable heard, without seeing accused, could not be sufficient to warrant a conviction. Dealing with tho subject of language, Mr. Jellicoe admitted that the language of the stable yard, the golf course, or the military camp was not the,'language of society's drawing-room; lie was not trying to convey that some of the language of the society drawing-room would not be tolerated in the stable'yard. The accused was a man of good character, for he had .been a policeman, and, like all good policemen, had "blossomed" into a licensed victualler. He wae no "slacker" for he hadi sent his -test to Gallipoli, and had volunteered himself. In summing up, His Honour said that according to the law a nuin was no more entitlea to throw his dirty language through the window of his house than to throw any other dirty thing. A verdiot of nol/ guilty was' re!turned. AN UNUSUAL OAS®. .A well-dressed man named Andrew Julius .Finlay, the travelling representative of a largo American' business concern, answered! to his bail on a charge of having committed an indecent assault on a boy. He pleaded not guilty, and was represented by Mr. T. M. Wilford. The court was cleared during the hearing of tho case, and His Honour mad 6 an order forbidding publication of the evidence. Aiter a lengthy hearing the jury retired for about 20 minutes, and returned with a verdict of not guilty. Accused was accordingly discharged.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19151112.2.68

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2617, 12 November 1915, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
306

LAW' REPORTS SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2617, 12 November 1915, Page 9

LAW' REPORTS SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2617, 12 November 1915, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert