BRITISH WAR DUTIES
DEFENDED IN PARLIAMENT By Tele^mph—Press Association—Copyright (Rec. September 30. 11.45 p.m.) London, September 30. , In the House .cf Commons ;Mr. • R.. M'Kenna (Chancellor of .the Exchequer) defended the import ■ duties on' the 'ground that they would favourably affect, the exchange rate, which was now against lis; He repudiated tho contention that the duties would 'prejudice .Free "Trade. The whole case- of the Government was that while a Freetrade policy' was the - best for normal times, there might arise conditions in war when they could not retain Fred Trade. ..The Government as a whole had no intention of, adopting or discarding one theory or, ihe other. Mr. Bonar Law repudiated the imipression that tlie'import duties would result in : pressure' on; the Government by the Unionist. members of "the Cabinet. .What .would, happen'to ;the tariff after the war none could'say, but the change would not affect the fiscal controversy. " ~ Mr. M'Kenna promised to exclude motor tyres, chassis, and, parts used for trade purposes. Tlie House adopted the sugar duty.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19151001.2.82
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2581, 1 October 1915, Page 8
Word count
Tapeke kupu
170BRITISH WAR DUTIES Dominion, Volume 9, Issue 2581, 1 October 1915, Page 8
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.