Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A PATENT MEDICINE IN COURT

VENDORS OF "VITADATIO"

PROSECUTED

ALLEGED MISDESCRIPTION

INTERESTING EVIDENCE

(By Telegraph.—Press Assn.—Copyright.) Sydney, May 29. The Crown Prosecutor, under the Pure Food Act, proceeded against Elliott Brothers on the ground of alleged misdescription of the patent medicine known at Vitadatio. The prosecution relied on the statement, printed in a pamphlet sold with the medicine, that it oured Bright's disease, hydatids, stricture, cancer, consumption, ringworm, and paralysis. Expert evidence by Dr. Cooksey showed that Vitadatio contained 2.5 per cent, of proof spirit, also salicylic acid, tannin, gentian, sarsaparilla, and senna or rhubarb.

Dr. Palmer, principal Government Medical Officer, declared that according to this analysis Vitadatio could not curs Bright's disease, hydatids, cancer, or consumption. Ho made the further statement that, with the exception of quinine and mercury, no drug ever oured anybody.

Other doctors supported Dr. Palmer regarding the diseases mentioned.

For the defence, evidence was given in support of cures in Sydney. Arthur Palmer, proprietor of Vitadatio, gave evidence that he was ill for fourteen years in New Zealand, and was treated for dyspepsia, liver, Bright's disease, and pleurisy, and subsequently underwent an operation in Invorcargill which showed that he was full of hydatid tumors. A doctor told him the only medicines which would cure him would also kill him. He tried Vitadatio, and it cured him. He denied Vitadatio contained tannin, rhubarb, senna, sarsaparilla, or gentian. A bottle cost him a shilling, of which the bottle cost twopence. the material threepence, and the labour sevenpence. He declined to give the names of certain herbs which lie said had cost him £20,000 to get from Welber. the original proprietor, but at the Magistrate's request he wrote down their names. The Magistrate found against the defendants, who,, he said, were merely wholesale buyers of Vitadatio. He ordered them to pay a fine of £10 and costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150531.2.69

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2475, 31 May 1915, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
309

A PATENT MEDICINE IN COURT Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2475, 31 May 1915, Page 7

A PATENT MEDICINE IN COURT Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2475, 31 May 1915, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert