Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"RESTRAINT OF PRINCES"

MARINE INSURANCE CASE. (Rec. April 26, 0.5 a.m.)

London, April 24. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Bray, in the Court of Appeal, decided upon respecting the definition of the words "restraint of prinoes, etcetera," in marine insurance policies. Their Lordships ruled that no actual exertion of force is necessary to constitute a restraint of princes; it was sufficient if tho master of the vessel abandoned the voyage in obedience toi an act of .the State.

Lord Swinfen Eady dissented.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150426.2.95

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2445, 26 April 1915, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
83

"RESTRAINT OF PRINCES" Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2445, 26 April 1915, Page 6

"RESTRAINT OF PRINCES" Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2445, 26 April 1915, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert