Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HUGE FORGERIES

CHARGE AGAINST JOSEPH EARLE 1 HERMANN. . J (By Telegraph—Press A'ssn.—Copyright.) ' (Rec. March 15, 9.55 p.m.) f I Sydney, March 15. a At the trial of Joseph Earle Her- t mann on three counts of forging ahd C ■uttering promissory notes involving a £17,391, the evidence for the Crown r t stated that the defendant conducted i; company formation and the managing e of investments. ' In April, 1914, Her- s mann discounted three promissory notes 'J with Hermann. Wallraff, manager of C Renter's Banking Department, pur- 1 porting to have been sent to and sign- f pd by a certain Triggs, a well-known r grazier. Counsel stated that Triggs c would swear that the documents did not represent transactions with him, I and that the signatures were forgeries. 1 Counsel for the defence argued that i the defendant had no knowledge of the i promissory notes. He admitted that !i if he had then 'ho must be ghilty. e Defendant was suffering from a violent « type of epilepsy, and a plea of in- a sanity was entered. a [Hermann was formerly a director of t the firm of Bowron Bros., Ltd., of New I Zealand.] s At the opening of the trial defendant ( applied for an adjournment to await, ( "de bene esse," the examination of Wil- s liams, manager of the Mount Oxide * Minos (in liquidation), and plaintiff's ac- t tion against Sir Albert Gould, F. W. i Bacon, G. F. Allen, T. B. Berbeck, and s J. Earle Hermann, Limited. Deponent's v affidavit stated that numerous charges v of fraud were contained in a statement ® of claim allegiug that the deponent's co- * directors were liable for negligence in ' not dismissing him. The damages claim- | ed amounted to £25,000 Deponent de- | sired to repel the charges and protect * the other defendants. He proposed to e call sixty (-witnesses. • * The Judge refused the application.' The term "de bene esse" may perhaps be translated "for what it is J worth." To take or do a thing "de 1 bene esse" is to allow or accept for the 5 present, till' it comes to be more fully examined, and then to stand or fall ac- j cording to the morit of the thing in its own value. Taking evidence in a Chan- £ eery suit "de bene esse" is to take it out of the regular course—a temporary v and conditional examination. -j

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150316.2.53

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2410, 16 March 1915, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
400

HUGE FORGERIES Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2410, 16 March 1915, Page 6

HUGE FORGERIES Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2410, 16 March 1915, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert