WHY MBS. RULTJvN DISPENSED ■ WITH ELECTROLYSIS. "I wa3, and am still, an expert Ln electrolysis," said Mrs. Hullen in tho course of an interview, "but I'm glad to say I don't need to practise it. Ulcctrolysis is not nearly So efficient as Rusnva for removing superfluous hair.' Electrolysis is naiuful, and no matter how skilfully done, every insertion of the hot needle mnst leave a little cicatrice—white scar ju6t as any other wound .will show after healing. But, with my improved Rusma treatment no needle, is used, consequently no scar CAN be left. In fact the skin is cleared and softened and improved. And I GUARANTEE a cure with Kusma—l've scores of testimonials/' Mrs. Hnllen invites all superfluous hair sufferers to call or write. Mfs.Hallen, flssUSty Snwialteti Emilwtt Street, WeilißStMi, Dejt - 3.—Adn*
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150304.2.4.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2400, 4 March 1915, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
132Page 2 Advertisements Column 2 Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2400, 4 March 1915, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in