A LICENSING CASE
"WET" AND "DRY" AREAS. (By Teleerajh.—Press Association.) Pahiatua, February 25. Hugh Francis- M'Lean, licensee of the Makuri Hotel, was charged with failing to furnish the Clerk of the Court at Masterton with a statement in ing that liquor had been sent into the No-License district of Pongaroa. The facts were that the liquor was consigned to a man who lived in a "wet," or licensed, district—Pahiatua. The man met the coach /in the "dry" area, and took the liquor home. The Magistrate remarked that _ the whole question was the liquor was intended to be taken into a NoLicense district. He quoted the Act to show that "an offence was created if liquor was taken into a No-License district : it was not necessary that the liquor should be actually consumed there. The Magistrate held that a technical breach had been committed. Defendant was convicted and discharged. Another information wa3 dismissed.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150226.2.40
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2395, 26 February 1915, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
152A LICENSING CASE Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2395, 26 February 1915, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.