BRITAIN'S SEIZURE OF CONTRABAND
FOREIGN MINISTER'S REPLY TO AMERICAN NOTE London, February 18. Sir Edward Grey, in his reply to the American Note-on the interference with neutral vessels, pointed out that war had not interfered with American commerce fcc Britain and her allies, yet the trade of those countries during four months of war had diminished by over twenty-eight million dollars, whereas American trade to neutrals and Austria had increased over twenty million dollars': This was a greater reason for protest against interference with innocent neutrals, by Germany's broadcast a scattering or mines, than for objection to -Britain's seizurp of contraband. Sir Edward Grey deprecatcd recourse to diplomatic remonstrances when neutrals had a more effective mode of address by appeal to the law courts.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150220.2.21.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2390, 20 February 1915, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
124BRITAIN'S SEIZURE OF CONTRABAND Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2390, 20 February 1915, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in