WHY MRS. HULLEN DISPENSED WITH ELECTKOLYSIS. "I was. and am still, an expert in electrolysis," said lire. .Hullen in the course of an interview, "hut I'm glad to say I don't need to practise it. Electrolysis is not nearly so efficient as Knsma for removing superfluous hair. Electrolysis is painful, and lio matter how skilfully ilone, every insortion of the hot ■ needle must leave a little cicatrice—white scar —j uet as any other wound will show after healing. But, with uiy improved Rusma treatment no needle is used, consequently no scar CAN be left. In fact the skin is cleared and softenod and improved. And I GUAIIANTJiU a euro with Rusma—l've scores of testimonials." Mrs. Hullen invites all superfluous hair sufferers lo call or write. Mrs. Hullen BMjif.v Km-isilisJ, Eoujcott-Street, iiasUm. 1 .it. AdvU
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19150217.2.4.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2387, 17 February 1915, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
134Page 2 Advertisements Column 3 Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2387, 17 February 1915, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in