Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A RANDOM SHOT

INCIDENT IN THE STRIKE. Theca6eof Arthur John Dockery, a young man who was shot during a strike riot in Webb Street at the end of last year, was referred to in the House of Representatives _ yesterday. This young man was injured by.a revolver shot m the shoulder, in the course of a riot one night at the time of the disorder which accompanied the watereiders' strike. Ho petitioned- Parliament for compensation in respect of his injuries, but in the course of his petition he stated that the shot which injured him was fired by a special constable. When the committee brought down a favourable recommendation some weeks ago, it was referred back, and at the time of the reference back the objection made to the finding was that it cast an xinwarranted'reflection on the conduct of special constables. Tho committee reported again yesterday, and their recommendation was "that . the petition be referred to the Government for favourable consideration.".

In the debate which followed the pre, scntatio'n of tho report, it was.pointed out that the young man was not a striker or' a rioter, and that when he was hurt ho was out collecting music fees due to his mother. Messrs. Atmore, Webb, and Payne emphasised tie fact that Commissioner Cullen, of the Police, had statedVin his report that the young man was one of tho rioters, and condemned his statement as having been misleading. Mr. Buick said that it was beyond question that the young man was amongst the rioters, and asked pertinently .'"What was ho doing there? Did any of those rioters owe his mother money?" The Prime Minister snid that he had looked into the case of tho petitioner, and had learned that ho waß a respeotablo citizen, that he.belonged to a respectable family, and that he had nothing to do with tho riots. The Government would thorefore give effect to the recommendation of the committee. The opinion of other members who spoke was that.' there was no evidence to show who fired the shot, and no evidence to show that a special constable fired it.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19141009.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2276, 9 October 1914, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
351

A RANDOM SHOT Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2276, 9 October 1914, Page 7

A RANDOM SHOT Dominion, Volume 8, Issue 2276, 9 October 1914, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert