Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL

. A VICTORIAN. CASE. . By Telegraph Prees 'Association—Copyright •' London, July' 28. In the Privy , Council ; appeal case Syme v. iJhe Victorian Commissioner of Taxes, tho appeal was allowed with costs. \ ,;

. Lord Sumner, in delivering judgment, said the assessment oil the person exertion basis 1 alone filled the assessment of the trustees. ; What was tho produce of personal exertion was' in the trustees' hands till they parted with it, and it would not change by transfer.

In this.- case the' Full Court of Victoria ordered ohe ; of the ' beneficiaries in the' estate of the late Mr. David Syme to pay' a Is. rate, on the amount ■ which lie received fr.im the estate as, income from property, instead of a sixpenny rate as on income derived from personal exertion. Counsel for the appellant contended that the Income Tax Act defined all income .'derived. from any trade as income from personal exertion," and: that appellant should be charged only the sixpenny rate on income from the trade .which he carried on as one of the trustees of .the estate. Lord Moulton,'president of the Court, remarked that there was nothing in the Act to show that trade must necessarily bo carried on..by the person receiving the income. Lord Sumner asked: -riot. the .words 'derived fl'om any wade mean 'carried on by' the person who gets the income'?" ..

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140730.2.53

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2215, 30 July 1914, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
225

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2215, 30 July 1914, Page 8

PRIVY COUNCIL APPEAL Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2215, 30 July 1914, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert