Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

- UNRAVELLING A TANGLE l; OVER A WILL QUEER CUSTOMS IN WALES. An - originating summons, presenting some interesting features, was lieard before Mr.. Justice Hosking in, the Supreme Court■'■yesterday.' morning: The opinion of the Court, was sought in gard. to..'iv-honi:.diould be giveii one. of the shares, in the residuary estate, of Jolm farmer, formerly' of'Waipukuraii. yThs plaintiff was' John LleweUyn' Charles Mertbn, solicitor, of Waipulmrau,; executor of the estate of tho. lato John Evans,' and the "defendants, were "Elizabeth : ; Jones, ■' married woman, of Mnclor,: Degamvy, Wales, and Adelaide Brookes, widow, of Llan-dudno,-'Wales: ■ ■■-:■ ,31r. D: S.: Smith .appeared-for the plaintiff, raiertpii),;,Mr. J. H.- G. Murdoch, of Napier; .appeared for the exe-' cutor of Elizabeth Jones', (recently deand Mr. i. iSeave appeared for. 'Adelaideßrookes

;;;Froni;patticulars'before the Court it ' appeared'that; John Evans's will, after malnngr provision "for ~the: payment .of.; .certain legacies,, directed- that "the.resi- ■: duary estate. ; slibuld; be divided'into, two 1 shares;;, one .of;these shares to g0;,.t0, • ; "Eliza-; Brookes',; of' Llandudno, Wales, : tho daughter'of my. sister Eliza," '-Nona-' , of; the; nieces '6f. the'deceased answered' .the/name of Eliza-Brookes,'- but:, the riglit'tq the share (ah.amount ofi£soo) .was claimed by .two nieces, the defend-antsi-Elizabeth' Jones and,. Adelaide Brookes. ;:-;Thc: was a /daughter, ' of wliilo" , iAdelaide' Brookes-was; not, but;oh' the; otlier/hahd-'Adclaido Brookes, was a resident;, of JjlaiiduchiOji while ;Elizabetli' Jones-had not lived strictly within tho limits;;6f. Llandudno; ."at..'.the; time <h#:; ceas'edJwas.,'on'a ; ;visit.Hb Wales.';;-There' was;- however, .•c'onsidorablo .evidence by '~ affidavit ,to; show.' that; at: ah; ..earlier perip^ ; l'EUza^etli--;.Jbncs':h'ad'.^ived....>with>' ■ her mother in Llaiidu'diio, at aplace'call-'-.eil,''Tlie,;Bricks,'" and' that for;.the sake 'of;distmcti6ri.'; i -she ?: had.'.been 'knmyu-"as •f-'Eliza-Bribks." '/Itj.was v (said ~the affidavits).'a;i''cbriimbn'cusfcih: iii;; Wales' to distingvJisihVirt' ; this-', way ;;'^dif-; ' fereht people ]oi ,t!ie,hame of/Jones',.arid ■ . several "witnesses; expressed themselves. •,as:of. opinion ;that the deceased; (John ■ Eyans);had;iriterid<?di,;tb..leave ;the. half: share.;iri;the;residuary', estate to .',' Eliza ;BnclK';''.brit'that ; hisinterition' f hadbeeii '.mistaken-b'v'the/solicitordrawing 1 ; ,up; : the;\yill;;.'.Tliis;.was; supported in bnefof the a theory that the testa-;tor-(John.jlvans),/who ;had ; false .teeth,. .wasnot; at.tlie.itime; ■ lie ■ .instructed; his;- solicitor; in; regard to; 1 i the>preparatio.n.:or;the will..'. :;■;; . .;.Y'Mr,' ; ;,Bmith l : V-in;add^'sih'g'-,th'e.''Co.nr't , j'' contended .that -the.'; gift, 'to" "Eliza - ;Br6pkes".;-never .took': effect,-,-and -that ; the/monoy, should go.tb:'testatorVnext ;of- kin;; . of h 'Elizabeth;..Jones's rights,/while..Mr;: ;Neaye,'addressed.''%e-.Court on behalf 'of; Axlelaide;;Brookea/;*,':;;;>;;;; '■'■■. ■;,,; 'jA: '!.';;'; .HHis Honour:reserved judgment ■ '^i),. : , ' !IijSFDTE ) : : tho;.''.prirpos6 ;of/ascertainirigvt'lie; ; position-: of' the ;'Opuricil in'regard_to-certairivclaims-'fbr. : igmpensatibn; ;-which v had; /bete/'mado; ;agairist:;the;cpurity|'under. 1 ' the;; Public' . .vW6'rks;.Aot|. an-; originating. i[ -summons, i. was'/issued; in the .'Supreme .' Court .at. ': Palmerston Nbrth/.'and.yeste'rdayVit'was •' aigiied;before;the;/Chief"'Justice /;.(Sir, ' Robert Stout) j.- Mi ; .: Justice; Denniston,;. ! Mr. - 1 /Justice"i Edwards,i'-Mr.; 1 ;-; Justice, ' .Cooper, and; Mr. Justice; Stringer;. The ! . plaintiff;(was';. the l :;, ; Kairans'a-.v' County i ;Cp«noili' l -'v' : and\> v the' I .'^defendants.-\wero' ■Roberta- Edward 1 Bannister, journalist,' . of/:''Sydney,; William -//Joseph., Smith,'■ fa:rmer,;;rif;.LiritonV';arid r Smith' 1 ; Smitlij ; farmers, of \Co\jr' ; ■ r >/;rV-:;/ <'-:;/';//;■'/; : -- -'Vi/vr^K

:',f.l-Mr: ;H..,R.^CobperV; ; ;bf ■ Korthi'■:•'■' appeared', 'for- 'the' -.Kniranga £puiity; - Mr; : H,;Giff(>i-d;Mbore,; 1 otPal.nierstbri r Nortli,,;.appeared,. for'/the ;'do-' .feudarit'piirinister,'.while-Mr.;., C,-"';P. ;Skerrbtt.;K.C..'.with;Mr. Oram; fippear-' c4 r iforVthe defendants,,? Messrs; Smith.'. 25, ,1911 , : - a piece of land y : cpn- ; tairiuig 3 '■-. roods / anjjl .1' perch, 1 - situated' at. ;Fitzhbrbei , t;(ri'ea'r-J?alnierstbn North), in ''tuojKairahga. Coiiiityi, ivas'.taken:by,tho ; cb,unc'il ; :for:;tlieVpurpo'ses"'bf \J& '.public' rbadiv^'At 1 that tim.e'.tlie land was owned by ■:the; defendant (Bannister) and.leased bviitfe,defendants (Smiths). ;In respect, of '.the': land''taken-;.'.and>; "of adjoining; land;-alleged ,tb:be. niiiiriously,;-atfeoted,'. : forj compensation: were 'IbVl.eed-b'y Bannister and;by Sinith Bros.; in.'-Majrj-1912. - 1 A' ; Cpmpensatioii ;Cburt'was ; constituted,,and'sa-t on August 27, ( ,1912-.';'tiq hear-.;th'o claims,: but', after ..the ■locality;:had : been.'irispected,-the"Court' ladjoiirned ;to allow '.a -suggested,;settle-: was /foundimpossiblp to', ar--.range a'settlenieutj-; and no,definite.flate for any:futurO|hearihg.was : :fixed.; ,Suhr. senuently,M;on.:'.JuneJ;l3,. 1913, a-new: .claini 'i.forocbmpensation l was niade .by tlioii.doWclaritSjy.cbveriiig■aniflurit..ofvthb.pr'eviious::'scaiarote 1 claims, it, being 1 contended. 1 by ..defondants that: 'tliere;'.was no pbwpr to adjourn the Court .sine'.dibi'.aiid .Uiiit'.tlißr'efor'i a- new 'claim'must jbe'ffet.'up-. within ', t-bo;. ptntutbry tipie 1 to. 1 alloV; pf-'.it:l)c;iii.« i he.T,i-d ,by',an-. ; oth.or'Cbui-t. .to'lie' constituted;' :■-.■ '..'' : ',";,The-summons now- befbrp tlie ■ Court ;was; iss'ued'to~'deterinine the questions.ns to the earlier'claim 1 ! for com-" • neristi'tibri;, ; hacl lapsed or : h'n'i been aban.'dbned,;as to whether tho'Coninensa+.ion; .Cpurtv'set ;-;upi, to hear ..such';-claims': had, lapsedi'Vitd as.. ta;whntb«i\. tJiis claim of Jnnn, I ,.l9i3:i"'\v. , »S"'a yalid,,claim,. ~" ■ " - 11 - ,'Vi'Aftbr ;fc, hearing. nrguirient .Their '.Honours:' reserved' decision. , ':. c : ■

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140709.2.126.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2197, 9 July 1914, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
665

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2197, 9 July 1914, Page 11

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2197, 9 July 1914, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert