Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATES COURT

K'qLiMM.'.Fap LOST LUCCACE. • UABILITY V •;, "AN IMPORTANT JUDGMENT. .- An. important reserved" judgment.deal;. ing. v.'it/i, the .Jiabilit-y • or - siiippiiig com.pames!m resptcc.-tp ipst was <leuver.e.d- at'i'ue Magistrate; t>.'L'ourt'-.yes-teirjJlay By Mr. rWi.vi': Uiadell,,tj."j\l. .ahe .cfaiin was ;one ihade; by Annie Cbop'e'r; representing .>hor ■ -. iniaivt ■claugtiter, the:Ne.w-Zealand'fehipping Coin-' pany ior £ib'J6s. tor luggage- lojsv.oh ■ilie voyage ■from. London -'io ,1 Wellington oy-the liner iUia'tiirie'.: ; ' ' ■.■..'■' ;-?■■. A Umlt or Liability. ; . '.-". In tho "course of. his' judgment, • 'his ■ Worship.' said' that: the defendant company admitted that tnoywcrd responsible lor t|iO;.loEs'.o.f .the luggagel .but Contended that' under; , a f -coiKiit-ion endo.reed oii pjaintjlt's contract .ticket-its liabi,lit'y\vvas limited .tb'£6"in respect to ! aiiy passenger's luggage lost.or'.daniaji;,e'd on the voyage, unless.the value of .the luggage, in excess , of that sum,' was declarea «t> .'or -before, the /issue of , the 'eontriict * tjoke't.' ■ Tho defendant • company hid paid tho siim of ,£S into court lil'satisfftction'of: the,claim, and denied any further liability. ?. . - - :,-. ; . 'At tho "hearing, continued his -.Worship, a , number of. decisions, oh similar actions were..quoted,-'dealing; .with the-■liability-'of those who issue".tickets containing conditions either "on the face or on tho' back .of the 'ticket, , and .to- .what estent" persons' receiving such ticket's were tymnd'.liy conditions which 'may or may not :come under, their , notice. •The.decisions quoted stated the:law:Rflhcrally/'but''did■ ;ii6t give' much. assistance, wKen,' as.in tho present.caso, the form -df- contratt : rras T subject .to, certain Statutory- ro^ifemeate. :' ' ■-■•.: . ' '"'. CornUilons of-.'Passage.." The case of Dummer and another v. the ShaWj Savill, and .Albion Company, Ltd.,'decided .that. a-shipowner issuing a , , ticket f6r':a';p'assage to'.ths Dominion to'a steerage passenger in an.eniip:rnnt j .ship,.. uhder'Sfectio'a 5 320'0f the "Mer- 1 chant. ShippingvAct, \&9l, cannot, make it subject to a.condition, -whether on itsface or endorsed thereon, that he was not liable for injury '< to the passenger by the negligent-navigation of ..the vessel, i Section,32o of-tho^llerchant;Ship-ping Act, 1894. .provided for the issue of contract tickets, for cabin : or.'steer-, age passengers in ah "emigrant ship, '■proceeding from ■ the British Islands ; to ! any' port" out of .Europe; and Sub-Seotwn i,states;that 'thfe; contract ..ticket shall be "in ■ a' form approved by the Board, of Trade.; a'hd. published" ' n the. ' London' ■".Gazette; , .! ''■' By; Section 323,- any.pereon .who, after;;the issue 'of-' a. .'contractticket "and i during '.the ! continuance*: of. 'the contract\of. which the , -.ticket is;eyidqnee, alters :itor induces an,y person, to part with, it,- or retiders' useless-or 'deit, , shall £or : ; each offence (with exceptibna).he liable to , a .fine not, , ex-coedihg-'£2o.-'.'-.Gertain'conditions, appear, on'tio face.<>{ both (saloon and steerage, -passengers' .tickets, and' qc-ndition' 6. 'which states/.that "when onc.e issued this tickct-.jnust not-ba'.withdrawn■ fro*' the .■passenger '.nor any ,altera.tipn,'.addierflsμf,β ; made in it," na. found, .on : both : fonns'.'., .Gonditiqn.;? , found- in tho stosraje/cassenger's ticket is' not contained , in -the form'of saloon passen-. gers , ticket's 1 .-' Again, -the'steeraße pas.senger's ticket; contains,, in the body thereof a. v statemeht limiting.the.value of luggage'; carried under'the contraot, .unless declficed'by/the passenger. " This from: tho body .of thp saloon passenger's.ticket, tut the defenjdants'.hayV endorsed oil the back of the 'plaintiff's : ticket'a iiumher of conditions, idno 'of : Which' , (No-4) .states .that :'.'neiither. the , shipowner- nor tlio passenger, irpker,-qr'agent is.in.aiiy Case-liable-for.' loss -of, ! or. in jury, to,. or. delay in ;'deli v-; .cry, of liiggago or personal effects'of •paßsengers Beyond the amount 'of '£5, unless. , tli'o ; value of th&. excess , ;of that'.'sum atjor 'hefore, ith'e: issue' of this contraot-ticket, and. freight''at cprrent/rates for.every kind .of. property (with.certaihexceptibrie) is 'paid;"-- , '■■■■■■!;'; ° ■; - ; ; -' ".. ."•' ..." V- Passehger's Assont Required. In Dummer's .case, in discuseinp; tho effect of Sections 320; an- 323,.upoirthe forms of ticko't. issued to cabin and'steeraee.passengers respeativelj', M>, Justice •,Ed.wards:.said:;"Thiß Section (3.20 appears to contemplate one form-of contract ,ticket only. Two forms, one of a cabin'paßsengerJs ; ticket, the , other'of .a 'steerage passe.hger'e ■ticket, 'have, how , - ever.been apprbved of> by the Board , of Trade. . Tho . two forms of. contract "ticket appear: to be necessary. '.'■... 'Aβ thfi ticket of a'-labin.passenger or. an emigrant ship.niust first be isßued to him in the forni prescribed by the Board of Trade, and his express (tssent.to any variation of the .contract- must 'subsequently be obtained, this desirable,result'follows'(if. the...statute is obeyed), :th'at.his_ afteivtipnmust. be,directly "called to-'his rights undijr the : statiito r aiid 1 .to the extent, to which he is! asked by ■thr shipowner to part with' , those , rights. Tbis ; exeiutles. tlie sbiponner from qualifying his 'liability 'even as to cabin.pas-fienaers-by..nptice of'conditions ininosed' by him upon the contract..... . .'.'.'.' : ; . '• In- the present case, concluded his

Worship, "the plaintiff did nb'e pei-ssnal» ly :obtain Her tkkoh f.ra« th« HrfeKkn.l company's LojKfoii ofliec, iip.v ys tji;-rc any evidence that the eqittfiiioH uWJer which the defendant eompaiiy ssiisM. to have its liability limited in respect fit luggage, was consented to by tar, or lief agent at, befc*e : , or ?{|«r the jsssie of the contract tfcfcat. M;is Warship was satisfied to adopt the spinfem. espj'essed by Mr. Justice? .BflAv-af'tkH.i.n jjumfwr's case, .that if it. cabin passetoer's rights were .to be linlited. toy •cttiiditions (.«■- dorsed on the Wntysofc ticket, hi acW/i" tion to those eo , ntained. ill the fprni ajj* proved by the Softrd; oS: Tfaife, tbeii hi* attention mtjst te <iirefetty esileq.to'the matter and his excess assent gh'en ia any 'variations of tha.forrivof cfifrtracis. "This throws sine onus-of the assent on the. part,' of the paSseiiger «n the defendant;,.,a;nd'.here- it hits iitffc, in my opinion, b'eSn .discharge*!," saiij his in epn'cltißi'qu. ... : Judgment till be for the plaintiff far thefullamounii! ckiined, with costs £.2 6s. '

.Notice of apjieal sras given br Jlf. M. Myers, who appeared fat the defendant company. Cpsl? tor SKpeal were feed a.fc £8 -Bs. At tlje teaniig. of tli«y «eSb, Mr, T. C.A. Hisfep appeared f or the plaintiff..,. . ';' ; ■ . .' civit *cii^s. CLAIM Ftm-GBWS SCW^tES, ■ The New Zfea'laftd -Fn-raiers' tivoDistributme <5».,..Lta., WeilkiKton, general merehauta,. .proceeded W.Page, grienrgfOEer, el.. I/eviii, for the .recovery of .£6-l|s, SA, being t : he value. of. goqeis siifiijl,ied» 'MiS, ■dolejid-ah-f .in the ..aetio'n (toijtfterkMwt.ed. hi '£215s.,.being -coiis incurißdiri fe/hrriiiiiK unsaleabfe produis?. alle.gM 'te tiye been purcliaseti irrfm the sarai6is' Oo* ope'rativo "Disbrifehifc .€«., -IjtS. After.'heariiift the orideuce Ms Worship cave '.judgftient &i- tbe. VUiritiit An the,claim for £2- 3s'. Sdi., and costs £1 16s.Vand _f<ir fte ifefeiidapt in , t'ke counter-claim.:. Jlr. H. A. Guft»iu.e■ham appeared Ipr the plaintiff, ■ and the defendant, tPdef) ■..n'si.s ■ not 'sohted. by counsel. '■ ■ ■'■ DEFAtiEFIJvS l^eiQifS. Judgment was /efttcrfd . lor plaintiff ■by detault in the fffl'lioii-Njtf'fiivjl a'ctiettg,'. by-Mr: ,W. G. "RMA &M,:-A, and IVBurt.'-Ltd;,^, J , , aahitvii*-£ls ■ 135., costs i'l lls:.'jJd.; Veftch. ai«J : Allan : v.. Heu» ; £3 Ife M., .costs 125.; Dpirtinioii Jleftafitita Asciiejy Ltd:,; v. . Ja'.nies, Bs.' M,, .costs- 75.; .W.' (3. '4ws V. j. S. .£6 55., costs ,£l, &.., 6tl: i. J. : A. lled.path.aud Son r,:\\ r m, -Sfe|flum ■£8:-16s..-3d.,, costs £t BU. Sd,-; Hush Walter "figeou. V. --P. ■ M■l6s. fid., cpsfe.ios.;>Jlpt!at. JirM.:v,.A, L,.-Sniith, fii 3s, |d., posje iOs,; Bjretger ..Dansoy v. R. JSfißlitiiljgelei ' £11, .costs £1.10s.; riiP.(i#oil Bfdt,'Ltd., \v John MarsWi, jaiiv,, S& , 85.,-tests £1 9s. 6d.; StaWfe.ifenkmr, .iSßfecrt Alex. Craig, 14's , , M., costs 7si+ Oi't.V ''Council v. ChiSS. Edward Sjiiyar, £o 14s;, ■ costs 85. s A.' t*- 'Nisoa V. L. M. ■-Wilson, : costs ■£!' 3s. 6d.; C{. a'nd.A. Odliii Go?.'. Md (i -Rafter ood<}, £1 75., costs -Ss 4 ;. same v, j.os'opfc John 'Russell; ! ll : d M ..<;!i3fc 05'.; Raifaclßodia v. A?. T. M'&atin, £% cesis ss.'" ■'■■'■■'■••..■ . ■ ■ ■ ' . JUDGIIEir StaiMOSSES. George James. Slitchctt *as ordered .to"p'ay Henry. I,Bs. 4<J., pa or ' before Jiily' 14,. in detault «i©i*. days in,'gaol;, 05..-{Stevens to pay 'GTp bert E. £1 Ts., 011 -qsc before July 14; in. JioUrs ijt J. . Millican'' to jsa-i' "ttVii. E. OQftrci.o.&]; £5 125., befomJulj? ; iKt' ifefaiift ftvti days in> gaol; Br.iicit Biftfis to fta,y Ast ton. Buddie Fitoheti, 4112 1%; &6<J."'before. Jtily 14, iii ten dsys , im-. prisonment. • ;! ■■ A OhAm ' '' -. In Kijo): Qilm.BV, 'dentist, v. o.' Kocitoibj a tflaiiii for £8 10s:, lned'tcal eSjJeflseaj Judajnent was'.ontcred jor : tfe jjja-intiff W . tlie .amount claimed with- ijosts £3 ss. OLD WOMAN BEG£ fQ& ALMS. ".Mr. dI.G-A. CbSßer, S.M., tie&it with the police at yestetdAi/'i isitiiiiK of the Slagistrats's Court, .The case (if ail old wmiaii named ■ Mary ;SaundeTS.,ivas, acain heard yesterday; when llie was cfiarfctf with being a rogue and a vaga%nti r: jw that she.' begged fqi: WtioDri.nis'peflidr Hendrey stated ifeij i&fr dijfeiidaini, over eighty yews, of ages llad been t';yice pteyjausl.y ebnviqtci.rf bShvg an idle and disdrdcyiy jicjSen, ani had boon ■ eelili tp ■ the, Olj.i.ro . Hoino, .'However;, Ihe .4ef4n:flai|t,wp.u:l:d:;.ndf! rciadm'there,:.:j|iif<l. she. J>atcl■■ bsen found bSJ?KinK for alpis at .K'a..rcri. . ■ • , His Worsh'ij) .fettartrcd thai if he .sent'- the acoiisijisl'to gSpl ( be Sduld bo* 'doinp; ,: liera,'kijio;i'Ui?JV The- defondaat td.eaifi.di no't to' seijt' to prison, but, 3E£is Worship coiKiderfed: it-would be te'ilcij better:.for lier ta t& • rniiin in security- during...ibe- wjn'ter. She : would' be sehte')ice.(L:to. six m(3'n'tib..s' jin*' prisonment. THEFT TROM HOTEL CECIL A joung man named Dauel Patnrk Cummings appeared on a charge f»f theft of artiplcs iahi«cl -\t 17s Cd , the property of Claude Fellows Tnompson, from the dwllnur hoits. of Margaret MTarland (Hotel Crcl) Formal e\ ldenco of idu tuicition. of tho itolen goads was anen h\ V F Thompson, ?ud artrr this the accused v,m remanded till Juh 8 SEPARATION ORDER REFUSED. Mr. D G A. Cooper, &M, judgment in the. caso i\ herein Ala-» M'Aenna nude aa application against 13crnard M'JCcnna for a summary stpa'ration, maintenance, and guardianhh.p ot the chilJren. Tito paH-es, ncro lesidents of Bleniiptm, and tho grounds on which tho application aas made «oie failure to maincsin and habitual drunkeiuioss His Worship hold tLat the dr-1 fendant had provided hw n te and chil-. dren with adfiquato mamtaiaitcr, and | tha.t thero was ne evidence that the! clcfendaut was an habitual drunkarJ. Tho evidence was quite cortrary to that charge. The order tvas rehsed. Mr D. & Smith appeared for complainant, and Mr H. K. 0 Leary tor tho defendant. MISCELLANEOUS OASES James William Gribhlo was remanded to appear at Auckland on Juh 2, to answer a charge of deserting bis, child on Fcbmarj 8, 1910 A Frenchman, named Yeattvo Eouo Mallalien St Mar was remanded till to-day on a charge of breaking and entering and theft from the houso of Willram Sine on June 10. On a charge of being an >dlo and. disorderly perepn, Annie Mason was convicted and ordered to como up for sentence when called upon Slio was also made the subjecb of a prohibition order. Emily Webster admitted tho thef* of a pair of loot 3, valued at 325. 6d, tho propertj of Albeit llss Worship fined t'io accused thp \ohm of! the Iwots, 111 default this? daW u-> I prisoiiiuent. 1 l<ll insobriety Holl);; na 1 . fiiied lOt. Cn" S'-f offen'lci was fiiipf] 10s , and jpsoii otheis arie conViClrd andidi s clnr£;ed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140701.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2190, 1 July 1914, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,747

MAGISTRATES COURT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2190, 1 July 1914, Page 5

MAGISTRATES COURT Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2190, 1 July 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert