Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATES COURT.

PECCLUtt CASE GONDOOTOR PAILS TO PAY PARE, 'CHARGE DISMISSED. An information John lUelinrd iinelgrove, a tMm'coJKluclor, wjtli fsiiling 1« pay his train J'aro, «-jw il'i.smissed by Mr. 1). 0, A. t'oopef, S.JI.,' H! the (.'sitirt- vistortliiy', Mr. J. O'Siwa apjicared for'the Oily I Coijmijitwn, and Mr. A. \\. Biair ropreaoiapd Iho tlofoiniant, w]m pleaded not Kttilly. - Krie ,|«»cs, couiluctor, fitnttd .that Dm (i«i'oi«liMiti bisardod jiis ear on April "2&, ami paid two pennies as faros f«r iiiras(;lf ami <liis brother from ' Jftiwi Wtmet (Newtowjt) to Coufts'iiay I'lnce, defendant was on the top dock of tho tram. After laiving Coiirtenay j'la-ce, witness went upstairs te caßect fares, : fitid approached' dptejdaiit just as tho ear reached Winder's Coruei , . Defomlf Aiit ftiisl liis brotiior were then about Ito 'ieavo tho team, and lvitness iisfefei . for another penny. Defendant <leeSined to pay, statiug that ho is'its getting off. He (defendant) aitcrn-ards," esplwied that lie kid wishod to get of? at'Cmtrt- , ouay Pbtce, but lift liatd .boeft so intafc on fixing up some fishing lines which he ' liekl that- no had ovpr-kin his section. Witness thercnp&» wjinnrtcd Miat it qiiito a connnou thing—for wonicn c,s-ineeiail.y—to'ovcr-rtjm seciiojis. ■ Johu.Gaviio, a tramway inspector, <}oJ3oswl, to boarding Qμ train at Pino Streot. Ho ebftcfccA the- car, and the Titst; i*& ticteis w]iicU lie cxa:niiiu?<{ we» those held by tha detettdan* flnd Itia toother, fhfire h&d lioen amplQ lime for all pasßoMgel's to leave the cay at Courtenay Plato. Mr. Blair said Siut the cam vfns itii' portent, inasmuch as the- soadnctor was Btill i.n the traniv/ay servico. Tho tiott was that,-the dclaKlant- awl liis brother Jiad intended gcioXg t<j flriuntal Bay to fish, Inst they wore intent on fixing tlioir fisking lines, and did not notice that they Jmd passed t3io section ending at Oovirtenay Plane. Btjfendant ha<i esplainod tlie {wsitwM to the eendtiotar, who hsul said: ''Oh, all right, get o|f!" When gcttiftg ofi, imjw. ovw, they met Inspector Co.Wo, who infortHWl tten thfjt tln?.v ftoukl 3ia.ve to j>6y Oieir lams, Tjik they did a± onc-o.

Defendant aad Jiis frrOtfcji-, Pred, Charles Knigbt SitelgvoVo t gave ovideiieo c&j-roijflmtiiig Sis. Blair's statement. ; His WoTS'hrp sail that, it ft-as cpiite possible that t'tee bad hefrii a misitii. fteystnntiiiig. TSiero inks an eleinen't uf doubt in the oiise s mwi Hie. ntitild be given the benefit of it. The inforuialiQit would bo dismissed, iviijhont ■costs, James \vfts femamfal 'lill June 10 on a dargo of being loii-ad )iy day with .Iwnst-breafeulg JBijjlowailg iii lii» piifssets-imi. . AspHlciive of q-hq moulli's iiH.prisO]!rnent was iimjtqsstl siu Saiuttcl Veitii* vflw pteiidoi , ! guilty -fco a. charge- of -t'laei't of an ovefceat valued nt> £'Z 155., tii-e- property of William Horiiig. , Peter Ciirric, who was elmcgctl with fiuluig to proyido miunteimnco fei- a>i iUcgitinsato oii-iW, was remanded to .up* j?fia,c afe Dtme.cH.ii ow Juno 4. I'o.t four breaches of his prohibition, orfcfi Josepii.Jolinson was.brdexed i(t Ijii pWod in ihe Koto Roa .Inebriates' Bofflo for a piH'iad of two years. On a cliaj'ge of iij-Sotiriiity, lie? viis filled 10s., in defiHilt 443 hours' i'mprisomitoiit. Jeliii I'rysft >yas fin»d £2 on eacli of two charges «f ineobrioty, in detoj.lt 14 day.?' imprisanmeiit. B'afflttfll Smith, , siffti'laiiy charged, ftas ftiied- XOs. ■Tβ* first-. eifeirfere w«ro convic-fei .awl ciafged, ai-jil miot'hw was fiued 10s. civil ieysiHESs, TUB BOAKDimiliE LAJsBLOEO. SOME iNTESiINfi POINTS-. ' Aii iirtcTestiftg point was deejded in a case ja which Jaile Wils.ott sucel fie.orge Sehli for £3 l@s., allegM! m be -duo- is payment for tiiree welts Wa:Kl aiiil lodgings at t-lra rate of 255, pw'ffcfeb.. DeEeiidant, tot £5 7s. fid., the aineUnt being wado \\s as Mlows :*r!Rofirad of fel'Ts, Gd. f ait'-seveii-weeks' bfl-aftl and: J.otlging at ?t- tii.ft rato el' Itii, fid. jxj* -wet'k, aad alsa £1 lor l.uss of a pair of boots..

j.n .(*s.jicct of ilie ■cwfltei'-clvuii) it ivus Statett thai defendant's ■inisjnc'S.s fflVces6JtiiW frpaHetit aWiwes from WoUte ton, audit bad beoai uHiiifftlly ajrire'efl thai ©ft Vl-wse pccasfens ii-o should pity only Vh- ej. pet ft'cfck, as rent ei; tilts roojfi wlieh ho eceiipiedL hi cousidftta-t-io.u of this tluo-plaitit'rff agreed t» re-. EjQWfe ths ttara entirely tor liim.. D<ifon* danl lrjet b.ean α-wdy fwrfa for sotoH weeks, and oi) ]»s rehittt ho iJiHcl £4 fs. Stl. as reiit of tlra Mom., A pair o.f boots had lietm taken irtfi tho room <3tiriil'S Ms jitjSMlco., JSloSCeViftr, ivotftj&vstanding feo an'aiTgciwciit, tT» plativtiff dad let tlte room teitti* Uie <kfcinJjtiit's nbsoijoo, alicl llild received paj'toeHb te' it. -.in 'coij.S«iuow:co o.f this delciidrnit chimed a refund sf £1 7s. M. nncj t!i.o sum of £1 far tfee loss g;f flic boots..

Aftnv hearing s VPorsJttj) ■55avo jndgWiomt'for pkiirtift for tl.tc fijil i.momit, "tot «« crtiisideiwfcioti <tf ti.tc agreeraent by tliq pfekitiff tj> i-s§o.i-v.e Hie ■rflojn etjttely tor ftp 4?fe«4ant, he «&n----sM(*rc4 ilia t t])(; <kfeiitltujt was entitled to a Mund rf #3 los. Tlio pflsitfen wwl.4 l>o tjmt plaintiff jVfliild lioye f(i%meiifc or tlio Aim for &., wit'li jeosts 16s. Oil, and iudgmeflt *eui<l te 'for. [ plaintiff iii the witnter*ctaiiii fo.T £2 ISs. I Kogjitiing ttife <lßfr)idrtwt'e oiaiin for the less "taf boots, Ills AVwsliip talfij ttat tv knoiDGi" is iK»i HftMo fer tlie lass »f JS)*mJs tint are b'rotissJit jittn. i>4^ liaiisft ty a- bdardaS'- A 'taspftr is sttppescd to toko tfco o.nlinary [ pf eoaVitie-ns to ensntt- tiro salftty nf ftfends ■ tiiat n pntttKMJt hmwelkwaer mow take, imt iJicve ti> j-flsptanrfliijity «nA=. J&bji if tlw biKijrctof's soods an> gtefcji by s sffvani in tiw to so, tho loflfrinsheinsß 1 keeper is not, KaWo, wnte **■ fton:|s i hav* Wfl lin.iietot! over ta Win for safo cuitodjr. ' . , . I Mr -T l f . I'. D'flfefln for plaiiitiff. afld Ml*.. I , - W- Jacissw d,efeftfeJ the case.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140603.2.105.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2166, 3 June 1914, Page 11

Word count
Tapeke kupu
942

MAGISTRATES COURT. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2166, 3 June 1914, Page 11

MAGISTRATES COURT. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2166, 3 June 1914, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert