Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN ARBITRATION WORKER'S DILEMMA

A ..: . . ■ I The plight of a carpenter, who, in ! slflok times, had accented work npan tiie wharf (luring the strike, "to keep lite, pot, boiling," and was bliwcted to b.v his fellow-workmen on gcttiiic; efflfitoynwut as s carpenter on a job in Culm Street, was retorikjl m * ttoesc columns a cmlplc of weeks ago. As the result, of the men's objection the foredismissed tJso man in question, stating that Iffi had to choose between doing _ so or suffering a hold-up threu<rii a strike. The same man is acain 'in hxrabte. Ho secured work <an"Saturday last on a job in Old Customhouse Quay, ;mc.t worked that forenoon. Monday was a wet day, aiul there was nothing tiding. Oh Tuesday; owinir to the rain, work did not begin until i 0.15 a.m. Nfifc long afterwards he saw Mr. Blatlmnvick (the secretary af the Carpenters' Uuiatt), and us. a result of his conversation lie d-ecittod to pay \\\i his the uninn. He arriwd at the secretary's offiee at 11 a.m., paid up £1 Bs. art-cars, ss. entrance fee for rejoining the union, 2s. subscription, and 3d. for a book of rules—£l I'Ss. sd. in a)!. He then went homo to hnich. At 12.48 p.m. hn returned to work, aisd was iold by the foreman that he would haw to leave, and liavini; no optlan but to do so, was paid off, after having worked hours. The man referred to states that though, ho has complied with wctj , ntic and regulation oE the union ho is a marked man through haying worked on the wharf during t!i'i> strike, and was being jeered and gibed at by the oth«r men with such j-ewarks a.-,, "What's the matter with the wharf?" The foreman of the, wwk said Uiat the principal reason for th« timi 1 * dismissal was unsatisfactory woi-.km.M-: ship. He had breu tried and feitud wanting. Sir. Blathonyiek (the union secretary) said that his ottly cencerti was to see- that members were financial". He batl no desire to bo drawn into the j sqii.abble. I Tte complainant ou his part says I that he is as competent as , any trades- ! man in WeMtngtan, and is sure that his i dismissal was not. ou aceotrot of any I ranissness mi that seoi'c.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140514.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2148, 14 May 1914, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
380

AN ARBITRATION WORKER'S DILEMMA Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2148, 14 May 1914, Page 3

AN ARBITRATION WORKER'S DILEMMA Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2148, 14 May 1914, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert