Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OUR NAVAL POLICY

/ ; '- ; THE PACIFIC . QUESTION SHOULD NOW BE ?; '.■;>■■ * SETTLED {'■: VIEWS OF'PAST AND PRESENT :-. ■■ > DEFENCE 'MINISTERS . ■ VJly Mcgrajilv-Prws Aeeociation-Conyriirht ~,,<IU'C. May Vi, 9,10 p.m.) ■'"" .""' '■"'•"".. Vancouver, Mav 11. ' ; Mr: Arthur Myers,. M.P. (New JSeaiand), in an interview, said that ho was ulnd to recognise that the Imperial spirit was growing in .Canada equally with New Zealand. Tho vital question f|>r consideration now was tho defence of the 'Pacific. Tho tinw for dclinite fiction had arrived, and tho foundations oiiglii now to bo laid for tho future policing of tlie Pacific. Canada, Australia, and New Zealand ought to unite for this purpose. White fully recognising our indebtedness to the British Navy, ho felt that the time iiad arrived when the Dominions ought to share more in the burdens of Empire, tfc was unpleasant to think that New Zealand's existence depended on a friendly treaty with Japan. - 'The creation oven of a nucleus navy at the present time was a- step in the right dirtvytkil). "If," added Mr. Myers, "the Empire ever falls apart, it will be due to a lack of sympathy, a lack of'imagination caused by a lack of knowledge. Interchanges of ' visits by the people's representatives throughout the Empireis eminently desirable." HON, i. ALUN'S VIEW, QUESTION MUST RE SETTLED SOON. (By Tclegrapij.-Pre-Si Association.) Auckland, May 12. in referring 'to the naval question tins evening tho Minister of Defence (Hon. Jas. Allen) stated to a reporter that nothing further had transpired lately regarding tho -saggostal ImjHsrial Defence Conference. No date had been' named, bub the question "was ono that must !» settled 'shortly. In view of the breakdown of tho. 1809 agreement," tie said, "we must! know where wo are in regard to the future defence of the Pacific, and Australia, more particularly, mu .<-t know where sho is. Australia has done more than 'she was required to do under the 1009 Agreement, and tho position from her t»mt of view, as well as that of Now Zealand, is most unsatisfactory."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140513.2.54

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2147, 13 May 1914, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
329

OUR NAVAL POLICY Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2147, 13 May 1914, Page 7

OUR NAVAL POLICY Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2147, 13 May 1914, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert