Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COSTS APPORTIONED

BEkW', A3SB 3BDTIJIAIP PRO- : (By iycjrra,Bhs~Press A'bsp.?.irtlon.i . GUpistohurch, Jfey < 2. Judgment was-.given in the action tho Ofeial Assignee in fiw'kr-tfptay of the property of 'Walter Shaw agaliis.l t-lio TiujHtw I'ro.perty -fcfeipjpfttay, Limited (J'oliSl liivrie, lilark MiggiiiS-, Frank ■ Archq-aIJ., itaymisiid mid Sajm'tet Trevni'aa). Tho main point argued tft Mm lwai'iiig vfas an. apphciitioji io tho Court for a certificate for tho whole- costs of the. notion. ... "Biera is," his Honour says j-n life .i-udgpjeut, "very littfo authority au to tire- principles on iv.hipli t'li.o Court will give such se.rtifiestos." After disciissi-fig Fully the Waiters raised, Ms Bojlijnr Ssj'S; "I consider thai in the M(*;iiiii' ; ' stiluses t ; l}6 amount of coiis-rdcrafeion. tli ; tie deed, £5000 in tho ease' iif ili.o eoiftwa.fiy itnd £2K)Q iti cash in. ifro easo ol;; trovilr?,!, giving th.e.m teiict.t of tfee- in-. ■ terest involved iii the: posthonoment wf . cash payniontg, is a. liberal rmvoant at '. 'which to. assess tlioif respecttvo ijconiii*; : a-rj* iflt-erests ill t'hft case. There were,. ■ at'feast in tho case ef tho company, ii«*, \ p&rtiijtfc issues as.to Urn cliaraeteii.' of ; the eoiiipei.iSatio.ti jnv-olved.. jit .must ho.: ' rcnioinbo.rtjd, Mivover., that wlril© rcjiev..: tag tho promoters of thfr co.tapai.iy Jrcjn. ' any suggestion of fraud, I c'atoo to tho. eonclus.ioii. that tho haj-gjiiii was a hard; oho. I it) not sea any grtmiief for.fitairt*; ijig the eortifieato. 1 h.avo already, said; ■ ■ tlvat t sfio nothing.ift thb conduct of tho ■ : piajiliiff to justify it, Bcfondaijts, other' than. TreVii-rKit, will httv© ono s,c)i./oj. eosts- (if tho higher scale 3$ on fiisp% \ extra counsel for Soveii .n't £8 Ss. : per day, for six extirji at SIS .13s-. jicr', day-, for affidavits of di.scov.9ry :ifcl'o las,., aii!" for production discover;}'''■:£■!& 185,,' mid for :p'rodiictififi fltid iiisp.ee.t'io'n. -of; docftrhent's ii.O 3DS>> for costs oil .caveat £5 -6s. itefeftdaiit l/reV-'ii'rzsi will 3i.ave easts oh tho liighest scale- he if &J250.Q were .claimed, extra Cqirtissl for seven' days at £& Bs.. per da-v, six -extra, -drib's -sft. jl'O l()s., for afijd.av.it of dtecflvery. £5. fis,, and for production and: inspection of dociiirtentji ;C9 3s,' ! .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140504.2.51

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2139, 4 May 1914, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
339

COSTS APPORTIONED Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2139, 4 May 1914, Page 5

COSTS APPORTIONED Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2139, 4 May 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert