THE THIRD PARTY

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2125, 17 April 1914, Page 7

THE THIRD PARTY

(By Tclo.g»»ii.-l ! i*sS AisosittUon.) fl.upl«l.a.n.a!,..April 1%.,. Tito question of safeguarding; % i- n ' hwstarf tke "tWrfiwrty « «*»»• trial disputes hoard beteo tto Arbitmj. I»n Cotiri lias l)Wtt oftcu referred to .u (iisrusskms regarding ilw wortaig «t Now SUtoi labour law. «i«. ,, ; ai * tor cmppcd'vig 'a? s mn dflrmg <m mta> view foc'fovttm a d-eputatwM W" tn» AnoUlawfl fonneK' Union . and »'» Wiiao Miniate, Tlie pnrt-wute .wbloot oh this occasion was ,tbo stigSestol 'mivmcnt of a special rata to timber workers tev handling imported tiwbers. The "Uiird iiwrty' 5 in this east? aw tfcn builders ami farmers, and tk> deputa* t.inn dw-flt oil the Jiockl of safeprinnims their interests. 'Tfe Prime Miniate said the G<svermttM« cow aw> more m-te-te" witb the Arbitration Court vhnn with the Supreme Court. TJkw was no do«-W. tawv-DV, thftt,.ns pomtat on,, tl-isra ras i* drfflct in.Hi* mwiu. synt«u There was -often a. third party ■fa industrial .disputes winch at p-reso-.it had no statute? risw of -htaSfi.liCM.rrl wlwn ilvp- ciVKi' Was fermifc WHSvdered. Ho ttowlii ri'irt a-K.v *Wrd party «'bwh Wt suflWontly interested staid lu-v-p a lofjftl right to go to the Ctiurt and ft-i'vo nVtdenfi*. Tie tlvflttcM uh-iit iJio. law ii-Howed 11»4 to ho rlfliwr nsnv at Hip optran o? i-lio Court, tat.lto was not qititfl dear on tlmt point.. Ifcwould took into tlm matte, ami if -tw found Hint an. nmriidjiwnl <if tli» Art was iioeossacj.; I iin would lake stops in. that djrcfitfoiij