Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE SIXTH LECTURE.

SCIENCE AND OQMMON SENSE. A LGOICAL I'AKGtE, Sir. Dalfoitr delivered the si-jrtli of tlie scries of Gitford Lectures on January ■23. Speaking as usual item a few u&tes on tiio back of sn ei-ivotopej he jmrformod tiro feat, of making clear his views en the external world. Hα urade no refereftefe to tho disputes of ear; flitting philosophical systems, aft-d gave only slight indications that ho Wiis trc.tdi.iij; on tho perpetual battleground of philosepbers. His point Of view was that uf cointaoM. se-irse- and of science.

The lecturer applied to the scientific -vie* of. tiro external world his distiile* ; tjo.n between tlie causal swies involvect in bi?lie:f awcl ih.o ratianaJ> or, as ho ■ to-day prefGWcd to call it, tte? cftsittitivo, a series having relation to knowledge What, ho asl;ed, is the eomroMi'seiise view of tho «stemgl »vorid? It wo-idd be genej-aHy adniit- ■ ted thai common sgbso never -eons-idcis ; that external objects, fiioces of matter, ■the solid globe, tlie heavens ijiove, are mental states, and that it thinks ■ of them _4i!> indcpaiide-nt ei' the person who ■ Deceives bheivi. These objects aifcot us i U'lioii Wβ percL'ivo them and ivo do not affect tliew ty perceiving them. Pvirther, lw thought—but of this ha was not so certain—that when wo look at a i»a- . terial object we <fe not- thbk thai its reality is exhausted by the aspects of it that We perceive. He sminiled up by Saying that, accofdins to ■ common sense, tiis «ogttitiy© series, wlijdi is.o.ur belief in external things is u, direct and im&ediatc perception of ol)j(3ct3 thoinsalves, and he proceeded to mafeetho point on which his whole 'depended; the .foundation of Science, This siwrjle and direct perception .oP extenial ohjects is the foisiicfotioM uJjoii which tho whole saperstrueture •■ of science is built tip, beeatiso the jrliysi-. , oist aiid the pJiys-Mogjst look oii.tJib , materials of 'their researches "esatitly us yen and I look upon chairs and .tabl(B."_ The causal series which combines with the cognitive scries to .pi-o-duco tie belief in tho esteriial world is the business of sokneej alid ihere is netiwng immeiiate or simplo^oi l -. directaisout it. It is a very ftlaboi'ato.p-o-cessj not yet thoi'OfHghl.y utdc.rS.fapd, Hero Mr. Halfoni' tudicated tf e vAr.io.us kittds of knowlctlgo required-.''io ..give a causal explanation of ou.r-.-perception of tho sun, astJ-tmoitij-j.. sojar .physios, Qptics physiotegy/and.sq forth, WJieu . all those elabcuiit-e tvp.r.e qompleted, one arrives at the ilite'slibid ■ ■of tho miud, only to .!)? cofifantod with tho clwsm betwor-it. bj-jjjii iiud miu.d. —a chasm not vet,Widge,d ovei;.. .Qn.e■must a-ko l-ceollect- that our ■percen'titjns of an object are p.rofoun«Jly .inodihod' ! u'y ■ associations, memories, ■au.d...<fthe : r .ps.y'chalagical cou-sMeratimis.. tik tob'k'"fto '■ analogy of a .message seal; by. 'letter; post from one town, to another ts ilhs-. tnfte hew many processes hatl to be '. eom-pjrted befor.o ■» raessage,: startin<>. Win reality, couM reach jiviwl.- ~ .".. Havfeg thus described the ■•- contrast betwsen the -causal series aii.d. t-lje cag-w-tive scries in otir belief in the ester-: Dal worid, Mγ. Balfov-r pointod <tut that the distinction which morfenv scieivce draws betocßit lnatfar aiidthe percefv--mg nwiid is q. distinotion ilot Ruid'amentally.dilteßnt froai. tlie old dist-infi- ; tfo:n hetweeii primai'y and seconda-rv-qualities of matter. That distiuctioi has been carried farther by science, which teaches-that reality is" Md feo-m' «e temwl the tcrero of Its «)W:u o.f--Mots. We cannot perceive an oleotrou, otliei', or the retii-ial imago in our own relma. Science can never be ■ - «mteii£ : ,M\ J|«g*its -to fire unjjeiEßivaMe, and ji! teorid, as soreiioe pietwrcs it. is uioro aiid inorQ remote from the real world as. we perceive it or are capable of pereeiviflg it. It f .soron.eo that insists on the separation letweeii oar seftsations and inceptions aiid the aut»side causes pifldftcing them. St'totco then, js.in a logfciii tangle, TjjQ lectiircr p.oiatett out, again, t-Jiai what the scientist sees is the'com-ifteiii--Sense peroeptioti of the plain man, Wt what isaettially tlier-e is soroetjiing quite ai-ffare-nt. The fiesitioft of sefenee h sornetonK feke thai at' Loeke, who has ken jeS'tly <M-.i-ti,o.ised for developing a ttaary or tlie external world which never gives direct atees& to that wo-rjd hut airly -t-.o fiensflfaows and feftltogs produced by it. Mem Mr. BaMour again insisted "ilistt £-dieiice is entirely dependent upan tlfo ■eoiMnoift-seiise viosv of direct pereeption, and argued that it destroys its own foundation, and that it pro-vicles its own premises to be Hito-rfuscd vflth iJlu* sjon. Ho quoted -Sume's sta-temoiit iii : tlie "Dia-Jogues on Natural fheology" that Wβ oait only argue i'roni aii effect to a cause wheii he have .seen a siiuilar cause producing a Eimilai- effect.. Kobody, he .lias ever sefin..cl.eeti-ons and cfer'predtiehiK seusations. Wo have never, seen tho causes * aijd on Hn-nie's prhiejplo wetaßMot fe'uii.di'theofi.es of the causes -upon, tho effect.

External Realrty

; All tMs does "nest diminish Sfats faith ; which everyone has « ifie fact'of reaiity. Can svcj ]id. asked, imitate Hum&'g serene aequksceaoij. in having one set- of ■ doctrines for the study and anetW- for the market plaw, doctrines shout filings of werytlay lifer , Jt would be ar-rflgah* to speak of solving tl)o dJffiefiJtyj hut m thought that .ft would ho iwitfeatfld if we gavq up the idfia that \ve' peu'B get mir netion of an inde])e«.dm)t external reality as a oolvslusi.oH 'feml iuiriiodia'to pcro&jrtapn. mast start wUh Hal raality as 'an ineritaihte belief. We know that caiise is fhero and that i$ radppenaent «f the periioiver, anj if \ve are flat to mitto noiisenso of tj.ie whole preeess of leaniiiijT by esnei'ie.iico *e must -begin with the assumption, of au exterttal material mechanism.' 'ac'lmfi. upoii us.j asid try to find o.ilt hmv. jt acts.

■■[Reports of jjreviaus, Ject'nres ef -this series wete ptrtfeljcd stt Tirfc on lifloniii-ry *?• an.d a.ncl jiardi 6 and 7.] . ' '

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140314.2.85

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2007, 14 March 1914, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
943

THE SIXTH LECTURE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2007, 14 March 1914, Page 9

THE SIXTH LECTURE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 2007, 14 March 1914, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert