THE TITANIC CASE.
, ■-*?*+ --u. COURT OF APPEAL JUDGMENT. By Telesrash-'-I'rflSsi Assfleifltion—Go'oyrißat Lotidon, February 30. - Sir Vaughan AVillinmßj Lord Justice of the Court of Appeal, in delivering judgment in tho Titanic-case, said that neither directions preceding, the -aoiitrart nor notices to passengers following the contract are part or parcel of tho con : tract; thfireforo, it was umicecssavy to. consider whether saffieiont notice, of the. exomption elanse had been given intending passengers. Even if tho cxeiitptioii. clause tvero part and parcel of the contract, it was hot in the form prescribed by the Board of Traded
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140212.2.41
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1982, 12 February 1914, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
94THE TITANIC CASE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1982, 12 February 1914, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in