Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEGAL OPINION.

HOW FAR- MALCONTENTS MAY GO

. An interesting legs! opinion has been, obtained by the president- : of the new AY.harf Labourers' Union from Messrs. Meek- and Von Haast, touching the petitions made to the union' by certain members; of , it, calling , for a, special meeting under R.ule 20, sub-clawso a, to 'discuss (1) the'finances of the union, (2) the organisation,, past, present, and future, and (3) any other, business connected .with the union-that , '-is likely to affect tho welfare "of same and- of its members. A further, petition called f6r a mooting to consider resolutions appointing a coniniilteo of three to take chargo of. .the union's books, and instructing ,the president to suspend the secretary and his .two assistant's. Tlio legal opinion is as follows:— . First Requisition May be Disregarded, ''With ■ referenco to tlievnotices. given to the secretary requesting-him to convene n special meeting.of the union, wo beg to advise you aa follows:—Rulo 20 (.1) provides that such notice, shall specify the nature of the business to be transacted. ..Tho-. meeting -must' therefore be for the transaction of business, such as can be legally transacted at- a special meeting, and the : notieo must specify with some particularity what is the business'to" bo transacted. This is generally, done by requesting a meeting to be called for tho purpose'of''considering - and passing definite resolutions, in order that tlio members who; receive the notice convening the meet- , ing may know exactly what it, is proposed to do at the meeting. . "In our opinion the notice asking for a special meeting to discuss (1) the finances of the imipn, (2) the organisation of the union, present, past and. fu-. ture, and (3) any other business tliat is, likely to ali'eet the welfare of same and 1 of its members, does not- comply with Rule 20 in that, (a> The meeting is to In; called not for the tr.insnction of. business, but for a discussion at largo upon practically all matters nffecting tlio union; (l>).Tho notice is too vague,- , 'and-does not specify with sufficient particularity tlio nature of the business, before the meeting: The executive cantherefore either disregard the requisition or, if it chooses, call a meeting for tho purpose o£ tlio discussion, jhe pro-' ' . "■ .;'.' -I : "Øog; 1 '

-,-. i.;:-y:. .«* ,;*■-' -■ >; j; 4 .i; .: ::■*■ -j^y^iK'^ ' reßolutions\j^^'S> ; jfe^'ft?v i^?Wi£: ~ ;';;"Tiio:'other..iioticejjcaltlng for.Ja , ■ meet-■ ing ''for ~ t!ie?p; u i-])6seft, . oS:-\c'oii i sidc-ringt:re--; Ro!utione : icappoi»ting*:gatJcommittpc of' thrce«;fooi;takciJcimr};cft;ofSyhe -'union's , booksi'i.tp^jinvpstiga.te ; aiMl.-VrpportSto fa.. siibsßrinelit.jinectiirgJ'andjjiistnictiirg'-tlie president '■-,t0 ,,, -suspend: his , iwoViasiistato tionVof-"suchfinyest.igatipnji"'and.'appoint-iiisftw;bsactirigjsoerotarips; is;?*sp.-far' as. fjUpatioii; ,: ;that*\arises;;iilw\ve I ve.r,-; in:.:;eon-\ busines.33^ropb£edfiis.;fSUcHlsas^can ! ' ; bo legally Stninsanted;s;!|-jW<;-'(lo.Joii>t*tliink, that the? imion; : eanfauihorisi:iSa'committee to-'-.tak^chargeVofSthoVlJoolte^Tlio. , Imoksmtisc; , remain'; in v t_l)o;ciistody2pf,t!m officers ..ofJtb.eTsocietv'J.in/order'Jths.t: the roil 1 , itu'iyi;hc:. : propprly:~:entere(l.,."lip,;, and the '''account's'''of.-itlio isocietyjcept.l) The bcoks , should' registered office, in;.ordofwthat«?persons''desiring to inspect'Hhomymay : "information required bo given! to:;members. Tito union . can'y-'-if ■ it , . so/desires/- appoint 'a eommittroto'iiivestijiate the .Itooke,.. and report.the"rbsult 'fif its .jinveslHjat ion to a subsequent' , meeting. j-vTherb, is' no objection ; to ..eallinp- a -''meeting.'. n for the purpose,'.of "considering'?■'a'": resolution worded-a s follows ;n-.VI .-'That - a cominit■iee be appointcdrpf..;.three-'members of the , union,'fo make-'.nSth'oroiigli■-investiga-tion of tlie uuioii'silxioks'and to report to a meeting to be subsequently called.'-' We ■ would point 1, qirt/.Tiowever, tliat so far as tho hooks of : account are concern-ed,-the union has two responsible auditors, who can be called; upon to audit tho accounts and report: tlmreon, and who have access to?all , books,: papers, vouchers, etc., connected with, the union.. Tho utiion:can therefore,eet a report as to', its ' accounts from.' tho auditors. ■ ■■ 'V-•!-'■■"-;■. ■' ?■'■ ' ;: . Ttre Second Requisition also Futile... ■With regard to the. second., resolution, it appears.,-to u« that the power of .buspension of the secretary is'.given, to the president only, and, not to the union, and that ,i special meeting of tlie union cannot suspend- tic- 'Secretary and his assistants, or gjve.instructiftns.'for. such suspension.' to which the president can be required to. , conform, :.ndr can such meeting appoint two acting -secretaries. Tlie rules'make no provision tortile ap-poiiitrrient-flf two , such officers: Further, a meeting of, tho union "cannot/appoint officers'. "'That"" is the ;f unction of ••the executive which, governs'.th<> union, and wliich.by Biile 1G is to:fill,, up casual raco'nescs.. If the :unioir desires to re* move the secretary, from offieo-.it must do.'so in' tho manner ep-npifwd l in Clause. 15. As, however|---we understand that thi"secretarv has been -appointed for."a vear and .vearly>sala,Tj,":i{-lie'-is rciuovctl' from ' office without csuec. suen as ! proof-'of misconduct, he-will'nave'a snlistantial 'olairh for ■'damages'- aptainst the union.'.' We- aro therefore of opinion that tho cxpcu'tive is not oWigcd to corrtplv with ■ this requisition." ■•-, - ■ ■ - The uetitioner-s have -been .ropli«t ..to. along the lines'of the logel opinion. •,.,.,-.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140116.2.70

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1959, 16 January 1914, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
752

LEGAL OPINION. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1959, 16 January 1914, Page 8

LEGAL OPINION. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1959, 16 January 1914, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert