Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CURATE WINS' HIS LIBEL ACTION.

CASE OF THE REV. THOMAS GHENT. ; By Teleeraph—Prtss Association—CopyriEM •London, JftitHnT.VftbJ-ii'ii Oil the rot rial of the liisc! ease Uia Ksv. Thomas Ghent v. Fitzgerald., a verdict was given for tho plaintiff ami ■■■•■■■ £100U damages awarded. Fitzgerald asked for an adjournment on tiio ground that lie was without means ami unable, like Ghent, to ;.ip;K'al to the public i'o , .' subscriptions.. The Judge refused, and pointed out that if ho was without 'means the law provided Hip machinery. liesides damages, Sir. Ghent obtained an iiijuna-. .:. tion against repetition el' jt|ie slander,, , ... (Roc. January U, 0.10 a.m..).,. . {LoncSori, January 13. Fitzgerald said that ho wrolo on Satimiay'asking llro Bishop of Soiithsvark to hold an inquiry. The Consistory Court <k'sirwl an adjournment until t:ie Bishop had replied, but tho Judge .pointed out" the law provided the machinery, •by which pmplc 'without means could bo- •■ protected. ■ Fitzgerald said that ho had been unable to eross-oxamiiip so nblo and slibtro a"man as tho plaintiff, and dramatically . left tho court. Tlii- was an action (heard in November la=tj iiirfituioil by the llov. Thomas Ghent, curate of, St. Andrew s, Stodnve.U acaiimt one Fife-jerald, of Clnplvnm,_ a police sorpoaiit, rto rat to fte pansli vo'lrv nnd nlleg«l that Mr. Unont Had comuiitteii misconduct with his wife, who was an active churcli woflier. -Mr. Clhent was employed in Australia, ami New Zealand (Clyde, Ota K o) from ISM to ISOG jrrs. Filzgcrald, who is aged fifty, in til! 1 witness-lKix, admitted misconduct, inclii'lins!-an allogcil apranlt. during a j urn Wo sale, Oilier, prtdence showetl thai: slip was lWUTotic, alwl that her huslMiiut bad prnviously nccuwd flnotlicr r.nratc at i'onl-'iv of sitnilar" misconduct, but thn ciiraip was ivcquitled after tho Bislioji s inquirv. Mr.. Ghent, in his evideiice, accHfoil tire police seTgcanf of Wnckinailinn him. Tho Lord Chief Justice (Sir l?ufns Isaacs), in summim; up. said if Ghent was right then Use n{legations ww' a wicked fabrication or the. result of a neurotic womad's hHllneinatmns. If tlw.. (Ipfr-iislaiit was then Glient was a wickml, livpocrilicnl liar of Hio nwst. «<>- . KPiijilion.' After Iwiei; reliruiß till l jury, disagreed, and were discharßfd.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140114.2.63

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1957, 14 January 1914, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
356

CURATE WINS' HIS LIBEL ACTION. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1957, 14 January 1914, Page 7

CURATE WINS' HIS LIBEL ACTION. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1957, 14 January 1914, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert