MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
|> i: QHAFiCE NOT PROVED; I'' lOMI li UliW U WORKSHOPS vs> in tlie •>lii.";|..li:' : lC.ai'rl y-"s:.».rd:iy will! .;!;iio : ; '■'J' fi.'lP'" "nU.r'jiii>vav r. ill''ib'av.irigf ■ .*'<!\?.iik*X'.2t'x.nrt!i ; !irft:iK-"li'stWsjs. 'tffiiiiv .Kaifey-' . .Mr: • '!$ j?.™ lis s S-Mvi^Avn^ion; ,: -t hi; iipiii'l?,,: ■: •iini;- (!iii( j ;.l)t.:vc:tin>. lirobcr;: jirosivul- _ ilv.'i'li nciv.w.is i;iv<-ii hj~ iv-•:> ii'.i'i'i workin," • il.l il(' (: llOpS Ui \ kc*. .'uOO'. til :i t I'll'V v ! '.!)>!,* sotMl-JsjS 1 Vrllo]i;!ji ii t- H'; par!cc I'' : i Spe ¥ iii's\v "niiurwimlsi: ■ ' Mu!!rir: califxl-Uin :o/'..Fororal men, .\vlKi ; :-y.Ti.yalil(> So V.'.'esri.that h<> didiiot.gfJjiiuo jtlio^hwliivlieroiitlin: eel „• was- Biud;- s timo-ilk-godifW,. 11. was .I!rged/stiiat tl:e. lor liiin ttfysoH/ and'flwCikeyyasisiuglo; and not in;' money/ V 'Hw.- tliatr/ili'cicnilo'ieo',' was ..iuconclsisive.i.'usd jlio; tiisniisßcd,-.t!je, en SO.;, "j/ivWOUD '"sOMJ 1 AGAIN • Wiiiiiim SiinvaU Mann .iitid Thowhs Jf'Dcvctt,liad : ,tt • figlit inJTaranaki:.Street:on fiaturdaj^aftenwondappoared' in tho■ dock charged wit'li■ I'uivingi;used, threatening behaviour, in public. •. Maim nlkiged that' M'Devott had ealiedUiim. a f'rotten scab,'.'. and . had iilien";;*.truck, limi... Mann'.said, that, jic • was blatr.c-. loss irf tlm niattor, and he entered, a'plea, of not guilty..; 31'Dovett pleaded "guilty, to.breaking ih©• peace," -but-.«aid.;that Mann lied in his ■ allegation'about;'tho . us'., of ■ the torra "rotten seab." '..' He .said .that'the fact was that Manrf,had ' intervened in behalf of■■.. a; third, party,; and had -taken off his 1 coat to M'DevettV Jl'Devett was fined tho jnforniation' against Mann k'iiig dismissod. • ••. . . AFLOAT WITIIOUr HIS FARE ' fieorge. Hugh Ito:-s sras )>i ; <wg!ii*. for- .: ward on a cliarge of. hiLhaying'travelled, from Pietou •to Wellingtons by;-.tho Pateena without haviiig'paid'-liis; . . Ho. was fined tsuni t'iib faro is to bo paid.,; - THREE MuNTIIS FOR* llirrT, ' .. The theft of two "ovoreoats belonging to' Charles S. AVoodvrard; a. sccond-hand dealer, was alleged against James Oliver Armstrong,- wiio was only released from prison last week, Armstrong was con- . victc-d and' sent'' back..to f gaol months. .: • . dossing out" ' , • . William Skolley,.old and grcv, and Philip Angel, a young man,.,who., : wc-ro. foiind sleeping in Odlin's timber .jard, explained to tho • Court;, that ;they. had merely gone there .fori.a^doss—not, to steal or do any'v.Toiig.'■■■ ;i'-\ . Tho chargo against; Skelley, i.wlio'' entered a plea of not guilty;' . ed, and Angel,: whoso ple'a.:;.\vas.:'gui.lty, was convicted.and discharged: ' otdeii"cases ■ . For having broken a> prohibition order, William James was convicted and: diseharged. Christian Olsen was. ordered.;.to 'pay ' 7s. court costs for entering a Sunday. . <■ ■■' ■ John Sheehy was charged with haying been on hot«l premises on Sunday, December. 14.■■ ■ Ho pleaded not guilty; and said that he had cono to the house'for clothing, ho had loft behind .when boarding there. . Tho easo .was .adjourned Hill to-day. , ? ■ Arthur' Harold Smith.' was; sentenced to thirty ", days' imprisonment; for dis■'obedience of a maintenance.order.'V 1 A prohibition order was issued against ftmma Amelia Mason. •, - • ' Margaret.'. Williama. was : fined j ; .los'.''for insobriety, n.nd 10s. for breach of .'a prohibition order. ■■ : For insobriety, Elizabeth Mulgravo was fined ss. A charge that- sho was idle '' and disorderly, in that she. had no lawful visible means of support-, was . dis- ■ missed. Defendant showed in court that '■ sho had '£l 17s. 9d. • v : .-i : j-.. ■ ... For insobriety, Harry; Joseph Lye-aght - was fined £1, and Bartholomew Mahoney 10s.. , v..'- . -"-v. \ . Denis. Cronin i was. convicted ■ ot. hrc-ak- .■ ing a window., at Thorndoii 1 railway sta-; 'tion, and was ordered to pay ,7s.,Cd. .in restitution.. .. Godfrey Hanson, a fireman, was fined 10s. lor having violently resisted a con- ' stable, wlio arrested hikn on Saturday' for insobriety. On tho charge, of .insobriety'ho was fined ss. ... :.Henry Jefford was remanded .'till ;today on charrjes of having assaulted May '. Gibbons and on a further charge,of,be- j ; ing.idle,and .disorderly.. '£'%■ V.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19140113.2.96
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1956, 13 January 1914, Page 11
Word count
Tapeke kupu
579MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1956, 13 January 1914, Page 11
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.