Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN UNUSUAL CASE.

HOTELKEEPEB AND .BOABDER.

EBy Tclograph.=--Sp.bcial' CtofcrcTOonden't.) Waoganui, November 18. An Un-usuai case, bat oho of consider* njblo interest to the -travelling jiublio and ' keepers flf hbiis.es was heard by Mr, iverfc S.SL, yesterday, ' ■ tflion Mr, D. Hntehlns:, solicitor, of Saw Plymouth, sued "VV. i|. Halliday, Jiepiisep of C.bs.vaniies Hptel, \V:auga- . nui, for the Sum of £6, alleged to haivo booh stolen .from plaintiff .staying at tiro defendant's hotel last .September. The- hotel at the tipio was crowded with race visitors., and the plaintiij bad bceij Accommodated with a shako* down in oiio of t'lie passages. He stated iii evidence thaij lie- put- his coat and vest, cpnt.aiuing toe money, under his pillow. Next morning he went to tire- bathroom,, leaving tho coat o.ii.the ' bod. JJex't day* on'aitivifig. a£ New , Plymouth.-, ho found that tlip money was- ! massing, ifiid, contending that tlio de= fendant ■bo'telkeppoj' was .responsible for the--lo.ss-j iii. failing, to keep liis valuables safe, ho sued for' th.o .roc'pvory. Dofofldariti in the course of his ovidoftce, said he expected t-Ue plaintiff to take the ordinary cammon-senso pre* cautions of ahyo.no in similar cjreimi-' stances. i The Magistrate said- the whole caso' was one olfacta, and wliethor. tlie facts proved that plaintiff had acted prudently or otherwise Hinder the circumstances, lie thought tlip circuiiistanccs ought to ■ii-a'Vo. .suggested' to .plaintiff tiiat ho siiduld have handed ihe valuables to the 'hptelkefiper for sa'f-p. keeping, or that ho should have tak.eii themi With lijin to tho ' bathroaiH the nest morning. Ko lipid that the -plaintiff had not .acted prudently, and was not'oiititlod to recover. Judgment -was given fpr defendant with costs. ..

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19131119.2.40

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1910, 19 November 1913, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
272

AN UNUSUAL CASE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1910, 19 November 1913, Page 6

AN UNUSUAL CASE. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1910, 19 November 1913, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert