Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION'S MEETING.

Sir,—Any person reading your report of tlio '.typographical Union ljieoting, held on Saturday evening, would-come to the conclusion that Jl£ Hickey was present at the meeting. You stato; "After the members had rejected th* Strike proposal on an open vote, Mr. Hiekey is Reported to httve thrown overboard his principles and pleaded for a secret ballot—anything to cut off the free expression of public opinion through the Press. It was of no avail, however, and 'the. wreckers of labour unionism.,' as tha Federation of Labour have- been accurately dubbed, arc disappointed of another hoped-for victim." Now, sir t whether your reporter set to work to embollish the official report of the meeting sent along to your office, which was published in the other two daily papers, exactly as supplied by mo, or whether ho obtained'.his "information" from any other source, the report published in. to-day's Dominion is inaccurate and misleading. Mr, Hiokoy Was not present at the meeting, no-r any other representative of'the Federation of Labour, and just as the members declined to go on strike at the requost of the Federation of Labour, so, in their name, I decline to allow the union to bo used by any newspaper as the medium through which it may attempt to throw discredit on any person whatsoever. Trusting you will give publicity to" this denial,—l am, etc., JAMES HARPER, President, Wellington Typographical Ihrioii. , [Mr. Hiekey was not present in person at tho meeting, It Has his telegram calling on " the Typographical Union to strike that was midoi consid-

oration, and the supporters of Mr. Mickey— not Mr. Iliekey liimsclf—when beaten on tho open voting then throw overboard tho ] lit key principles and pieade-d for the ballot.. Might wo suggest to Mr. Harper that he rather oversteps tho bounds of His authority when no sots himself tin as ti censor as to what iiew'spapers shall or shall not say concerning individuals who have tleai,BS® with his onion on matters of public concern P Possibly, ho waver, ho has merely expressed himself unfortunately 011 tho point, its wo ourselves Would seem to have done in giving rise to confusion between Mr. Hiekey aiid those who.hold Mr. Rickey's ideas.]

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19131118.2.78.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1909, 18 November 1913, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
368

THE TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION'S MEETING. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1909, 18 November 1913, Page 9

THE TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION'S MEETING. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1909, 18 November 1913, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert