SIEVIER'S LIBEL ACTION.
"WINNINQ POST" ARTICLES DISCUSSED. By Telegraph—Press Association—Oopyrisht London, October 16. The libel case Robert Sievier v. Percy Bono, a solicitor, and Thomas Dey, a bookmaker, for circulating a typewritten sheet allegihg that Siovcr had blackmailed Dey for £1000 in connection with, an advertisement _ published in Sievier's paper the "Winning . Post," was continued. _ ' Dey gave evidence that Sievier had showed him tho proof of an article intended for tho "Winning Post." It was of a disgusting naturo, disclosing Dey's past life. After he had received seven hundred pounds.Sievier (who denies tho statement about tho money) published instoad a complimentary editorial. ; During Dey's cross-examination ~a specimen bag containing seven hundred sovereigns was exhibited. , It weighed fifteen pounds.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19131017.2.55
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1883, 17 October 1913, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
118SIEVIER'S LIBEL ACTION. Dominion, Volume 7, Issue 1883, 17 October 1913, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in