CIVIL LIST.

Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1824, 9 August 1913, Page 14

CIVIL LIST.

ORDER or CASES ARRANGED, JJr. Justico Chapman presided at a Chamber sitting of the Supreme Court yesterday morning, wiien .tiie civil list was called over, fixtures were made as follow:— To follow criminal list—Jane Hudson v. James D. M'Phee, claim for ,£524, alleged to be due for wages, etc. (before a Judgo and a common jury of 12). Monday, August 11, anu Tuesday, August 12. —Ida Davidson V. Cecil Charles Alaguire, claim for ,£2OOO damages for alleged seduction (before a Judge and a. common jury of twelve). Wednesday, August 14 (not before).— George Coulter v. the J. D. Williams (A'.2j Amusement Co., Ltd., claim for .£350, alleged to bo due for work done (before a Juugo and a common jury of four). Friday, August 15.—The Maoriland Steamship C 0.,. Ltd., v. Easson, Ltd., and Clayton and Buske, Ltd., claim for ,£319 18s. sd. alleged to be due on p.n. (before a Judge alone).. Saturday, August IG.—'Undefended divorce cases as lollow:—Alice May Dalley v. William Nicholas Dalley; Amy Charlotte Harris v. Charles William Harris; Margaret Jean Bowden v..George Carlisle Bowden; Mary Mason r. Henry Mason; Mario Horsley v. Percival John Horsley; Georgiua Murphy v. Michael James Murphy; John Thomas M'Kinnon v. Maida Dufaur M'Kinnon; Constance Edith Louanna Allwright v. Robert Sydney All\vright; Sajnuel. Champion v. Mary Jane Champion ami Ernest Simonsen. Monday, August 18.—The Sunnyside Land Co. v. Chas. Henry Osmond, claim for delivery of share certificate, etc. (before a. Judge alone). John Fuller v. Alico Gertrude Mary Fuller and Henry Percy Harris, petition for dissolution of marriage (before a Judge and a common jury of twelve). Tuesday, August 19.—Henry Edwin Manning v. Ellen Hall, claim for i£ls4 4s. 6d., alleged to be due for work done (before a Judge alone).

Monday, August 25.—Walter Mark Exton v. John Wells Chapman, claim for rescission of agreement, etc. (before a Judge alone).

Other cases, for which, no fixture has been made, are as follow: —Alfred Maurice Lewis v. Hamilton Gilmer and Allen Mnguire, accounts, etc.; Hamilton Gilmer and Allen llaguire v. Mary Ann M'Ardle and others, partition of land, etc.; G. W. Wilton and Co., Ltd., v. The National 'Dairy Association of New Zealand, Ltd., claim for injunction, etc.; Daniel Hannan v. Thomas Bevan, the younger, and J. E. M'Doriald, claim fot £1375, alleged to bo due under agreement (before a jury of twelve); the "New Zealand' Times" Co., Ltd., v. "The Triad," Ltd., claim for .£s74*Bs. 6d., alleged to be due for work done, etc. foro a jury of twelve); Walter Francis Tibbutt v. John Bryant Lane, claim for .£SOO damages for alleged libel; Mary Ellen Macarthy v. The Norwich Union Life Insurance Society, claim for .£332 10s., alleged to be duo for money paid; Chas. Pratt and Co. v. Wm. Turnbull, claim for' .£135, alleged to be duo on p.n.; Thomas Hastie v. Thomas Burt and Patrick Leahy Harnqtt, claim 1 for specific performance, etc.; Joseph Denholm Robertson v, Kenneth Douglas and others, claim for specific performance, etc.; William Reginald Yorke v. Margaret O'Neill and Timothy Kellehcr; accounts, etc..; Easson, Ltd., v. William John Curry and William, Holme St. John Lyons, claim, for .£SOO damages, for alleged breach of contract.