GARNISHING WAGES.
» OP DEFENCE ACT RESISTEU3. (By Telegraph-Pross Association.! Christcluirch, Juno 27. Tho Canterbury Trades and_ Lalxnit Council in s received the follo]\ty£ lot lor from tile Hon. James Allen, Minister fur Defence"ln reply to J'°" r lctlCT , ?" l "? subjcct of g-iriiislifnif of w°pf to the Hon. the Pruno Minister, T rrerct that von should consider this method ol dealing; iritli certain olfonccs against Defence Act as harsh. It must be boruo ill mind that tho law has to oe enforced, and that tho method of doing so rests with (ho magistrates, With whose jurisdiction I 'im unable to interfere. C.nrnishiiiß of wages if, however, considered « lo=s rigorous course than detention m military custody in U>o «>so of lion-pay-ment of fiiK'S."
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130628.2.26
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1788, 28 June 1913, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
121GARNISHING WAGES. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1788, 28 June 1913, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in