ILLEGAL VOTING.
CASE OF SIR STUART SAMUEL. A CLAIM BARRED. By ToleeraDh—Press Association—Copyrißht London, May 25. The case has concluded in which Oswald Forbes, as a common informer, sued Sir Stuart' Samuel, claiming ,£46,000 as penalties against Sir Stuart for sitting Find voting in tho House of Commons when he was not legally entitled to do so. The judgment declared that illegal voting by Sir Stuart Samuel had been prov-< ed, but that Mr. Forbes's claim was barred by previous writs issued by informers named Burnett, and Chambers. Tho Judge added that tho thrco informers had proceeded under the wrons statute. Judgment was therefore entered for defendant, with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19130530.2.50
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1763, 30 May 1913, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
109ILLEGAL VOTING. Dominion, Volume 6, Issue 1763, 30 May 1913, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in